such a response seems heartless and priggish. You want to protect your reputation? As what, for what, and for whom?
did you happen to read any of the material? I have no idea if Andrej H rises to your level of defenisbility, but it seems you could start there. http://www.dw-world.de/dw/article/0,2144,2742395,00.html The prosecutor's office said Andrej H. had met with a suspected member of mg twice and that the researcher used "keywords and phrases" in his academic texts that had appeared in documents written by mg, such as the term "gentrification," according to news reports. It also said that "as an employee of a research institute, [he] had access to libraries where he could inconspicuously do the research required for the founding of a militant group." petition http://www.policing-crowds.org/petition.html my trust rating is triple A. And I too have used the word 'gentrification.' martha rosler On Aug 17, 2007, at 3:02 PM, mason dixon wrote: > my capacity to determine the truthfulness of your situation is beyond > what i can invest. <....> # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: [EMAIL PROTECTED] and "info nettime-l" in the msg body # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
