Speculative unclarity of Parties at the root of failure to form a new Dutch 
government

July 20, 2010 by Tjebbe van Tijen /The Limp;ing Messenger

the illustrated version with a horse tableau is  at this address
http://limpingmessenger.wordpress.com/2010/07/20/speculative-unclarity-of-parties-at-the-root-of-failure-to-form-a-new-dutch-government/

Compromise happens to be the most radical act in politics, allowing for the 
sharing of power, accepting differences to such an extant that it even changes 
your own opinion. In Dutch politics there always have been more horses wanting 
to draw the carriage of state than directions to go to, so compromises of what 
direction to take need to be made. Today after weeks of negotiations the 
attempt to form a Liberal + Middle + Left + Green ‘carriage-and-four’ 
combination failed. We are back to two options that have been considered over a 
month or so back in time, with two possible ‘troikas’ (horse teams) with Left + 
Middle + Liberal or  a set of horses with Liberal + Middle + Right horses. The 
power distribution of all this pulling power is such that the two combinations 
on view – once again – will have the same pulling forward power as the pulling 
backward power of the possible opposition coalitions in parliament. So the 
outcome may well be no movement at all. Backing the wrong coalition of horses 
may end up with putting the cart before the horse.

What we see is the unwise consequences of parliamentary democracy, where 
parties did not make it clear before elections with which other horses they 
would like to pull the carriage. “It is to the voters to speak” that is what 
most party leaders said before elections. This speculative and unclear tactics 
whereby parties try to keep the mandate they receive from their voters to 
themselves and settle a government coalition in non-transparent outmoded secret 
back-room negotiations, have now shown its undemocratic face and utter failure.

The Netherlands need a fundamental change whereby the dynamic favour shifts of 
the electorate can find a real democratic expression in a series of binding 
combinations, that have been communicated clearly before elections. With the 
institution of a direct involvement of a constitutional head of state – in the 
form of a hereditary queen or king – in the forming of government coalitions, 
the Netherlands remain one of the most backward nations in Europe when it comes 
to direct forms of democracy. This in spite of all the self-glorification of 
the Dutch as a freedom loving and superior democratic nation. That is nothing 
more than double-dutch fantasy… or better a dutch-lie.


Tjebbe van Tijen
Imaginary Museum Projects
Dramatizing Historical Information
http://imaginarymuseum.org
web-blog: The Limping Messenger
http://limpingmessenger.wordpress.com/


#  distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission
#  <nettime>  is a moderated mailing list for net criticism,
#  collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets
#  more info: http://mail.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l
#  archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: [email protected]

Reply via email to