I see there's some follow up on
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/12/16/wikileaks_mirror_malware_warning_row/
including a response from wikileaks.info
> We find it very disturbing that Spamhaus labels a site as dangerous
> without even checking if there is any malware on it. We monitor the
> wikileaks.infosite and we can guarantee that there is no malware on
> it. We do not know who else is hosted with Heihachi Ltd and it is
> none of our business. They provide reliable hosting to us. That's
> it.
> While we are in favour of 'Blacklists', be it for mail servers or
> websites, they have to be compiled with care. Just listing whole IP
> blocks as 'bad' may be quick and easy for the blacklist editors, but
> will harm hosters and web site users.
> Wikileaks has been pulled from big hosters like Amazon. That's why
> we are using a 'bulletproof' hoster that does not just kick a site
> when it gets a letter from government or a big company. Our hoster
> is giving home to many political sites like castor-schottern.org
> and should not be blocked just because they might have hosted some
> malware sites.
> Fortunately, more responsible blacklists, like stopbadware.org
> (which protects the Firefox browser, for example), don't list us. We
> do hope that Spamhaus hasn't issued this statement due to political
> pressure.
--
---------------------------------------------------------------
Joly MacFie 218 565 9365 Skype:punkcast
WWWhatsup NYC - http://wwwhatsup.com
http://pinstand.com - http://punkcast.com
VP (Admin) - ISOC-NY - http://isoc-ny.org
---------------------------------------------------------------
# distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission
# <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism,
# collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets
# more info: http://mail.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l
# archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: [email protected]