+++


Survey


Ask if they own crypto
Ask if they fear for their jobs
Ask if they think art and literature are relevant
Ask if they think it would be relevant if the true meaning of the Mona Lisa was 
discovered on Nettime
Ask if they ever meditate
Ask if they know "esperienza" or any other non-English term for the Latin 
"experientia"
Ask how experience differs from theory
Ask why 80's theory is not yielding good enough results to justify the 
discussion time it uses up
Ask how experience differentiates text-making software from text-making humans.
Ask how experience distinguishes image-making software from image-making humans.

Advise they watch Ken Burns interview about the Esperienza hypothesis at 
Leonardo.info/is-everyone-a-leonardo.  
Advise they read Allegra Fuller's essay about her father Buckminster, 
"Experience and Experiencing," at bfi.org.
Recommend they read The Federalist Papers 1 and 85, esp. the first sentence and 
last paragraph, about democracy and experience.

Because this year is a very important year for making good choices.  


+++


New prose for nettime, 4/15/2025


"'The Great Regression':  a 21st c. US conservative strategy for sustainable 
two-tier constitutional democracy"

"Red Fortress" -- revert red-state governance back to 1950 democracy levels to 
protect ~270 "safe" electoral votes ensuring 50% wins indefinitely.
"Syndicate Methods" -- SCOTUS permission for unlimited quid pro quo in every 
context (Cohn/Hoover model) until further notice; plus reversal of all or most 
oversight and enforcement stare decisis.
"Distractions Galore" -- Tariffs and trolling projects by the Dopey Demagogue 
to make the crash look accidental.

Judicial transformation = fortress walls, i.e. skeleton
Culture wars = rampart soldiers, i.e. muscle
Bailout 2026 = sustainable resupply, i.e. vital organs 

Current admin is Act III and final stage of demi-Leviathanic plan since 1971
Judges were Act I and Culture wars were Act II with partial overlap
Bailout 2026 (see Harrington's "balance of property" in 17th c. Britain) is Act 
III, domestic economic mega-transfer

Prep for Second Cold War, like 1950, is the main imperative.
Top two priorities are A) military re-tool and B) dissent suppression, 
soviet-mafia style.
Re-amelioration can be considered a decade out.

Options for opposition: extremely limited, the plan is largely fait accompli, 
Samson-option-based.
Possibilities: name and shame, Esperienza-based cross-cultural unity, decoolify 
techtainment, persuade Xi, second indigenous critique, peaceful protest despite 
massive brutality waves from the Regressive right.
Pragmatic union of moderate cultures, in aesthetic and electoral terms, may 
contain damage and expedite off-ramp.

Silver lining: the blue half of the country might stay more or less the same!  
:)  


+++


>From Quanta Magazine, 14 April 2025:

"What does it mean to be alive? How does thinking work? Is my reality different 
than yours? If your mind has ever wandered across this existential terrain, 
you’ve joined the ranks of countless philosophers, scientists and everyday 
people who have, for thousands of years and likely more, probed their own 
consciousness.

"Despite all that attention, the phenomenon of consciousness continues to slip 
through our grasp. We try to define it, find it, even create it — and we can’t. 
Consciousness is to neuroscientists and philosophers as dark matter is to 
physicists: It’s here and there, but nowhere tangible. Our understanding 
remains just out of reach.

"This is not for lack of trying. Today there are dozens of competing theories 
on consciousness — what it is, how it arises and how far it extends. The only 
thing that all theories can agree upon is that consciousness is some kind of 
subjective inner experience."


+++


"Dear Max Herman,"

"Your hypothesis about possible allegorical levels to La Gioconda can of course 
count on my immediate approval. In Leonardo's thinking, as I think is evident 
from his manuscripts, almost everything is connected to everything. Our current 
distinction between art and science does not apply to what takes place in the 
Italian Renaissance, and certainly not to Leonardo. It is therefore obvious 
that his ideas about, for example, 'esperienza' are or become visible in La 
Gioconda. Leonardo was very familiar with the concept of allegory. His 
manuscripts also show that he made allegorical drawings. So, there is no reason 
to assume that Leonardo did not intend La Gioconda as an allegory, or at least 
that the painting has allegorical elements. I'm curious about your new indirect 
support that you found for this hypothesis."

"Ultimately, La Gioconda is of course not a one-on-one allegorical 
representation of ‘esperienza’, but you do not seem to claim that either. The 
painting has so many more layers of meaning. The proposition that Leonardo more 
or less consciously or deliberately applied this allegorical layer does not 
seem immediately obvious to me. Leonardo does not strike me as a systematic 
thinker but more as an intuitive thinker who also gives unavoidable expression 
to his oscillating thinking in his paintings. But let me repeat that I have not 
been very systematically concerned with Leonardo in recent years, so when I 
claim something about Leonardo, it is always based on my research from years 
ago."


+++


What I'm reading lately:


Adam Fix, "Esperienza, Teacher of All Things: Vincenzo Galilei and Artisanal 
Epistemology," Brill, 2019.

Pamela Smith, "From Lived Experience to the Written Word: Reconstructing 
Practical Knowledge in the Early Modern World," Chicago 2022.

Codex Madrid (376 pages, writing and drawing, authored 1490-1499 and 1503-1505, 
discovered 1964)

Martin McLaughlin, Leon Battista Alberti book 2024, proves ample conceptual and 
literary network complexity fifty years before Leonardo's milieu.

Robert Zwijnenberg, "The Writings and Drawings of Leonardo da Vinci: Order and 
Chaos in Early Modern Thought."  Cambridge, 1999.  Superb network concept of 
"the labyrinthine gaze" in Leonardo's work.  

Albers, Anni: On Weaving; and quotes in Weaving at Black Mountain College (1938 
and 1944), interwar political consequences of incapacity for experience.

Albers, Josef: "Seeing Art," a poem about experience, and "Art as Experience" 
essay 1935 after fleeing Europe.

Erich Auerbach, Mimesis, 1953, e.g. pp. 549-550 on how 1930's European 
authoritarianism exploited Europe's ongoing inability to represent 
multi-perspective worldview in literature and art.

Native American concepts of experience (biniik'eh/doo t'aa biniik'eh, Navajo; 
sdonya, Dakhota) and wheel/cycle/loop paradigms.

Second indigenous critique (researching, not found yet online or published 
anywhere, may need to initiate), about art and science whereas first indigenous 
critique was about church and state (i.e. divine right of kings vis-a-vis 
indigenous democracy, see Graeber/Wengrow).

Martin Kemp on "Science and the Poetic Impulse" (1985, same year as Calvino's 
Six Memos): 
"Where Leonardo differed from the conventional allegorist is that he preferred 
not to be constricted by the traditional, recognizable range of symbolic 
reference.  He sought what we might call a form of natural allegory, based upon 
his study of the essence or natures of particular objects and forces in nature. 
 To some extent this was derived from the medieval readings of the book of 
nature with which he was familiar -- Aesop's fables, the bestiary and Cecco 
d'Ascoli's L'Acerba.  But Leonardo tended to draw his own allegorical meaning 
out of his scientific understanding of the phenomena.  An example is his 
splendid evocation of a small piece of glowing charcoal from which arises a 
vigorous fire."
"The observational variety and allegorical inventiveness is awesome, but the 
sheer open-endedness of 'natural allegory' ultimately destroys the signifying 
codes which are necessary if a visual composition is to be read coherently and 
unambiguously."
https://www.jstor.org/stable/41373924 

Olga Tokarczuk, "Ognosia" on experience and other themes, 2022.

Herman, M.  Commedia Leonardi Vici: the Leonardo Trilogy, MS 2022.  

+++


New art available:  

"My name is Experience." 

One-page PDF available free upon request.  

It consists of a copy of the Mona Lisa on the left, and the above words on the 
right, landscape orientation.

Long-version (Commedia, 800 pages) also available as PDF upon request.


+++


Excerpt from new work in progress: "The World Novel"

[Long-form fiction about two text-generating programs in 2032 who populate a 
web page daily with 250 words about why people should discuss the Esperienza 
allegory hypothesis.  They are programmed to try to get everyone on earth to 
vote i.e. rate the page before the end of 2032, and to get five/five stars as 
average rating.]


For April 14 the words were these:
  

Since we have to get these star votes up to five fast, and ten billion of them, 
we have to pick up the pace.  We really appreciate all your help with this.

Every year, it’s not a bad idea to select an I Ching to help guide your work.  
You can do this using a Virgilian Lot approach, opening the book to a random 
page, or if you have I Ching stalks to throw.  Our I Ching for this year is 
“Preponderance of the Small.”  It makes sense.

To help speed up the process of getting humanity to discuss the Esperienza 
hypothesis, please review the following list.

•       Contact the Buckminster Fuller Institute.  Ask them about the 
Esperienza hypothesis.  Send them the Ken Burns interview link, 
Leonardo.info/is-everyone-a-leonardo, and tell them you think it relates to 
Fuller’s daughter Allegra’s essay “Experience and Experiencing.”
•       Check out Adam Fix’s 2019 Brill article “Esperienza, Teacher of All 
Things: Vincenzo Galilei’s Music as Artisanal Epistemology,” about how the 
composer and musicologist made “Esperienza” the key principle of all his work, 
and passed the ideal on to his children including Galileo.
•       Tell three friends to vote on our page, and to email one Leonardo 
scholar.  They don’t have to do anything special, just ask the scholar if they 
have heard of the Esperienza hypothesis (that the Mona Lisa is an allegorical 
portrait of experience and experiment) and what they think about it.  Very 
free-form, no pressure.

Thank you,

a.alpha and a.digamma


+++









-- 
# distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission
# <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism,
# collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets
# more info: https://www.nettime.org
# contact: nettime-l-ow...@lists.nettime.org

Reply via email to