[A couple extra references re Internet Writing, perhaps related to Benjamin's 
"Critique of Pure Experience" cf. "Walter Benjamin's Concept of Experience and 
His Literary Practice" (2022) https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6m5322tj]

+++

Hu Fuming later said in an interview: "The views in the article are not my 
original ideas. Every philosophy teacher in the university understands them. It 
was just that I wrote them out at a special 'time point'."[9] In the article 
Practice is the Sole Criterion for Testing Truth, Marx said that "people should 
prove the truth of their thinking in practice" and Mao Zedong said that "the 
criterion of truth can only be social practice".[10][11] What was not mentioned 
in the article was that Hu Shih said in 1921 that one of the core views of John 
Dewey's experimentalism was that "experiment is the only touchstone of 
truth".[12] This concept can be traced back to Charles Sanders Peirce.[13] In 
1954, when the CCP criticized Hu Shi, it said that this was different from the 
view of Marxism.[14] Hu Shih's experimentalism was criticized by the CCP as 
idealism.[15][16]

Legacy
Before his death, Ma Peiwen, former deputy editor-in-chief and director of the 
theoretical department of Guangming Daily, published A Major Historical Fact 
That Must Be Clarified, responding to the view among the central party history 
researchers that the article was completed at the behest of Deng Xiaoping, and 
pointing out that the creation and publication of the article had no direct 
relationship with Deng Xiaoping.[17]

In 2019, the "Chinese Language Textbook for Senior High Schools" compiled by 
the Ministry of Education was officially put into use, and included the full 
text of Practice is the Sole Criterion for Testing Truth.[18]

[Above excerpted from Wikipedia article "Practice is the Sole Criterion for 
Testing Truth"]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Practice_is_the_Sole_Criterion_for_Testing_Truth

+++

Abductive (or retroductive) phase. Guessing, inference to explanatory 
hypotheses for selection of those best worth trying. From abduction, Peirce 
distinguishes induction as inferring, on the basis of tests, the proportion of 
truth in the hypothesis. Every inquiry, whether into ideas, brute facts, or 
norms and laws, arises from surprising observations in one or more of those 
realms (and for example at any stage of an inquiry already underway). All 
explanatory content of theories comes from abduction, which guesses a new or 
outside idea so as to account in a simple, economical way for a surprising or 
complicated phenomenon. The modicum of success in our guesses far exceeds that 
of random luck, and seems born of attunement to nature by developed or inherent 
instincts, especially insofar as best guesses are optimally plausible and 
simple in the sense of the "facile and natural", as by Galileo's natural light 
of reason and as distinct from "logical simplicity".[130] Abduction is the most 
 fertile but least secure mode of inference. Its general rationale is 
inductive: it succeeds often enough and it has no substitute in expediting us 
toward new truths.[131] In 1903, Peirce called pragmatism "the logic of 
abduction".[132] Coordinative method leads from abducting a plausible 
hypothesis to judging it for its testability[133] and for how its trial would 
economize inquiry itself.[134] The hypothesis, being insecure, needs to have 
practical implications leading at least to mental tests and, in science, 
lending themselves to scientific tests. A simple but unlikely guess, if not 
costly to test for falsity, may belong first in line for testing. A guess is 
intrinsically worth testing if it has plausibility or reasoned objective 
probability, while subjective likelihood, though reasoned, can be misleadingly 
seductive. Guesses can be selected for trial strategically, for their caution 
(for which Peirce gave as example the game of Twenty Questions), breadth, or 
incomplexity.[135] O
 ne can discover only that which would be revealed through their sufficient 
experience anyway, and so the point is to expedite it; economy of research 
demands the leap, so to speak, of abduction and governs its art.[134]

[Above excerpted from Wikipedia article "Charles Sanders Peirce"]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Sanders_Peirce

See also writings of Peirce at Gutenberg:

https://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/65274/pg65274-images.html

+++




-- 
# distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission
# <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism,
# collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets
# more info: https://www.nettime.org
# contact: [email protected]

Reply via email to