The affair DSK and the forgotten IMF self-criticism report of May 20. 2011

August 16, 2011 by Tjebbe van Tijen

A fully documented and illustrated version is available at

http://limpingmessenger.wordpress.com/2011/08/16/the-affair-dsk-and-the-forgotten-imf-self-criticism-report-of-may-20-2011/

THIS IS MY FIRST QR-CODED tableau try it:

“Bonnet d’âne pour le FMI” (dunce’s cap for the IMF; literary ‘donkey’s cap’) I 
read in Le Monde Diplomatique of August 2011, with a sarcastic comment by 
Pierre Rimbert on how the arrest of Dominique Strauss Kahn for sexual assault 
of a hotel worker on May 15th overshadowed a self-critical report of the 
International Monetary Fund by its own “Independent Evaluation Office” (IEO) 
published on May 20. The report itself is on-line and worthwhile reading, 
because the ‘economic assault of international banks’ on all of us is too 
easily overlooked as we all like daily scandal better…

These are some harsh findings in the report of the Independent Evaluation 
Office of the IMF:

“…the relevance of research to authorities and its utilization were hampered by 
the lack of early consultation with country authorities on research themes and 
by a lack of country and institutional context.” [page 27; paragraph 75]

“…there is a widely held perception that IMF research is message driven. About 
half of the authorities held this view, and more than half of the staff 
indicated that they felt pressure to align their conclusions with IMF policies 
and positions. Policy recommendations provided in some research publications 
did not follow from the research results, and a number of country authorities 
and researchers noted that IMF research tended to follow a pre-set view with 
predictable conclusions that did not allow for alternative perspectives. This 
detracted from the quality and credibility of studies and reduced their 
utilization.” [page 28; paragraph 77]

“…there was no IMF-wide leadership of research. Research activities were highly 
decentralized, and there was very limited coordination across departments. 
There was no mechanism to set IMF-wide priorities or quality standards. 
Collaboration among staff across departments was limited and mostly based on 
personal relationships.” [page 28; paragraph 79]

[tableau picture of an iPad with the logo of the International Monetary Fund 
and the critical report mentioned in thsi raticle, a QR code gives for users of 
Android, iPhones or iPads direct access to this IMF report in PDF format]

Click picture for bigger version and test the QR-code: tested with iPad 2 and 4 
QR-code apps: QR HD, Scan, QRdeCode, Qrafter (the last one is the best as it 
zooms automatically and is a free app) It should bring you directly to the 
report of IEO "Research at the IMF: relevance and utilization."
Reading the self-critic report of the IMF made me check its reception and how 
it was related to the impact of Strauss Kahn and his short lived IMF reign. It 
lead me to the English language Turkish newspaper ‘Today’s Zaman’ (said to be 
close to the Turkish Justice and Development Party) and a long comment by their 
columnist Asim Erdilek, from which I took this citation:

What both IEO reports omit, however, is that since 2008 the IMF’s official 
views have been moving away from the Washington Consensus. This began under the 
former IMF Managing Director Dominique Strauss-Kahn, a former socialist French 
finance minister, who chose his compatriot MIT macroeconomist Olivier Blanchard 
to be the IMF economic counselor and research department director (see my 
columns “The IMF’s evolving policy makeover” (1) and (2), published on Feb. 22 
and March 1, 2010, respectively). In several recent publications the IMF has 
demonstrated its tilting to the left in economic policies by calling for higher 
inflation rates as well as greater financial regulation in developed countries 
and for capital controls in developing countries. We have to wait and see 
whether this tilting to the left will continue, creating an opposite research 
bias, under the IMF’s controversial new managing director, also from France.

Christine Lagarde one of the few ministers in the cabinet of Sarkozy’s UMP 
party that survived the frequent reshuffles of  France’s president (“Le joker 
de Sarkozy”; Le Figaro; 2009), is a lawyer by profession and not an economist, 
she is known for publicly denying bad news and proposing her view of  ”la vie 
en rose.“:

Christine Lagarde estime que “le gros de la crise est derrière nous” Le Nouvel 
Observateur 20/8/2007 (Christine Lagarde estimates that the main part of the 
crisis is behind us)

Christine Lagarde: conférence de presse “L’économie française repose sur des 
fondamentaux qui sont solides [...] Je ne conçois pas aujourd’hui de 
contamination à l’économie mondiale” Le Monde Blogs 17/8/2007 (Christine 
Lagrande during [an often cited] press conference: “French economy  is put on 
solid fundaments [...] I do not conceive today a contamination of it by  world 
economy”)

Lagarde : “Il n’y aura pas d’éclatement de la zone euro” Le Figaro 18/11/2010 
(Lagarde “the Euro zone will not be blown up”)

If she will be anything more than a mouthpiece for the international banking 
world is doubtful, if her method of public broadcasted optimism is enough to 
quell the financial crisis is most unlikely.

The conspiracy theories that have been circulating with Dominique Strauss Kahn 
as a supposed leftist belonging to the French Socialist Party, to be 
discredited by a schemed sexual intervention, leading to the appointment of 
another French director of the IMF from the right wing  UMP party of Sarkozy, 
are grotesque. DSK is a man finding apparently pleasure in risky violent sexual 
behaviour. The coming-out of the lady he assaulted, did also put an end to any 
Hollywood movie inspired conspiracy story, with high class  call girls on 
secret missions. It was indeed just a lady doing hotel work who befell the 
outrageous assault. Sarkozy may even not have been comfortable with the demise 
of DSK, as with DSK  the interest of France in an international organisation, 
was some how manifest, at a level beyond national politics.  That a politician 
like Sarkozy grabs the occasion delivered to him by DSK’s fall, is obvious, but 
this was first of all a improvised emergency measure. And so Christine Lagarde, 
promoted by France,  added this “personal touch to her pitch  to lead this 
global institution” for the board of IMF directors on on June 22, 2011:

“I stand here as a woman, hoping to add to the diversity and balance of this 
institution. I stand here as former head of an international law firm with a 
dedication to integrity, to the highest moral standards and a belief in 
participative management. I stand here as a Finance minister who has been 
tested in times of crisis. I would like to put these skills and experience at 
work to serve the International Monetary Fund”

‘Rue 89′ a daily platform for commenting the news has a comment on a radio 
interview with Lagarde still as the French minister of finance with ‘France 
Inter’ on April 11th this year, where she also has to answer questions by 
listeners. A pensioned lady comes in the broadcast and explains how she tries 
to live on 800 Euros a month and succeeds only to cover 15 days with this 
amount. Comes the answer of Lagrande:

“Le gouvernement a tout a fait conscience de votre problème et c’est pour cela 
qu’il a décidé d’augmenter de 2% les pensions de minimum vieillesse.” (The 
government has been completely conscious of your problem and has therefore 
decided to augment with 2% the minimum elderly pensions)

The commentator on ‘Rue 89′, the economist Jean Matouk, precises in his article 
(*) the actual government measures, 4,7% augmentation for the minimum elderly 
income and 2% for the pensions. Matouk tells us in a sarcastic tone also to 
what it boils down: “16 Euros more pro month. What is she moaning about?”  The 
next question to Finance Minister Lagarde from radio listeners make her jumps 
from tens of Euros to milliards, as the support for Greece and other “weak 
economies” in Europe and its financial consequences are brought in. I will not 
cite the whole interview here, details are on-line in French, but what is 
striking, is the correlation between the way the poor pension lady is helped by 
Lagarde and her world of high finances and the way ‘global economy’ is handled 
by the same forces.

[tableau that shows of Europe riding the bull in ancient version, plus a modern 
sculpture with the same subject and the captions reads "Christine Lagarde 
riding the Euro bull in front of the European Parliament Building in 
Strassbourg while the New York Wall Street bull is waiting her, a symbol of the 
recovery of the American people from the stock market crash of 1987 by the 
Italian-American artist Arturo Di Monica, who placed the sculpture on his own 
initiative at first, later integrated as a city highlight. The charging bull 
shows in Di Monica's words: "the energy, strength, and unpredictability of the 
stock market." (**)]


“I stand here as a Finance minister who has been tested in times of crisis.” 
The pitch from Lagarde for the board of directors of the IMF and she did get 
the job. “Been tested” seems to be the ability of politicians to remain in the 
saddle during an economic rodeo, which does not mean that the bull she has been 
riding has been tamed. Alternative forms of domestication are needed and there 
seem to be no ‘alternative views’ possible with the IMF, neither with the board 
of directors, nor with their new head Lagarde, let me cite again IMF’s Internal 
Evaluation Office May 2011 report:

”researchers noted that IMF research tended to follow a pre-set view with 
predictable conclusions that did not allow for alternative perspectives.”

It is ‘alternative perspectives’ on economy we need to put an end to 
orchestrated ‘economic assaults’ that are at the basis of the legal system of 
our societies and remain thus – most of the times – unpunished

—

(*) Vivre avec 800 € par mois quand les banques enfument le monde (‘Living on 
800 Euros a month while the banks smokes up the world’; there is a double 
meaning here in ‘enfumer’, one of a smoke screen, the other of something being 
fucked).

(**) For details on the Wall Street bull of Di Monica see Wikipedia.


Tjebbe van Tijen
Imaginary Museum Projects
Dramatizing Historical Information
http://imaginarymuseum.org
web-blog: The Limping Messenger
http://limpingmessenger.wordpress.com/





#  distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission
#  <nettime>  is a moderated mailing list for net criticism,
#  collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets
#  more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l
#  archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: [email protected]

Reply via email to