DNS and ICANN and such are on their way out. Private namespaces are back.

The assumption - that, for example, xyz.com *must* resolve to the same IP 
number wherever the query is done - went curiously unchallenged for a long 
time. Now, seriously, why is it so important that google.com means the same in 
New Zealand and Czech Republic? Where is this notion that the planet needs the 
globally unique name space coming from? What makes it "good" (hint - you can't 
use Google, Inc. profits as an argument) ? 

Historically, only the state insisted on unique identifiers, for its own needs.

The unique namespace is a terrible idea. It's a shit amplifier. It skips and 
disables local roadsigns and greatly reduces the number of roadsign posters. 
It's no wonder that ICANN attracts slimy thugs - a prospect that few can decide 
on global naming has attractiveness of a dung pile for flies miles away.

There are very good reasons for having things harder to find. A complex 
discovery process itself is a great moron filter. During the search you may 
find things and people you didn't look for.


#  distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission
#  <nettime>  is a moderated mailing list for net criticism,
#  collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets
#  more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l
#  archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: [email protected]

Reply via email to