On 02/19/2014 10:38 PM, [email protected] wrote:
> Tangentially related, this is a rundown of student economics as measured
> by lifetime ROI for the price of tuition (in the US):
>
> http://www.payscale.com/education/average-cost-for-college-ROI-2011
>
> I loaded that up in Excel to get a picture of the data:
>
> http://geer.tinho.net/college.costs.and.returns.xls
Well, the numbers are interesting, thanks Dan. The chart is nicely done
too. Btw, is there an app for that? I would like to do some charts like
that myself.
Geez, looking closer I realize my Berkeley degree should have already
paid off a million! Damn!
At least somewhere along the line I did learn enough to realize that
this table does NOT include the cost of interest on student loans, which
for a lot of people must put a serious dent in the ROI (return on
investment). Additionally, the claim (under the "methodology" link at
the bottom) is that they fabricate their numbers through online surveys
of people declaring their current income, workplace, degrees obtained,
etc. Because the methodology section is extremely vague, one can only
guess that there is quite a bit of self-selection in their pool of
respondents: it's the people trying to get higher salaries who are gonna
pay money to this site to find out average salaries for their
educational level. As John points out, these numbers undoubtedly cover
only those who are in the high-salary arena, not all those who, for many
reasons, never got there.
I also learned (basically from Michel Foucault) that the name of the
site, "Human Capital," is a synonym for the neoliberal world view. The
theory of human capital was developed at the University of Chicago in
the late Fifties/early Sixties, starting with a 1958 paper by Jacob
Mincer called "Investment in Human Capital and Personal Income
Distribution." The argument is that not innate abilities, but rather,
investment in job training produces salary outcomes over the course of a
lifetime. Via the work of people like Gary Becker, also at UofC, this
argument became a comprehensive way of viewing and evaluating what a
person is and can be: a person's life is a return on investment. One
consequence of that, which really started to go into effect from the
1980s onward, was the idea that since people get a return on educational
investment, they can borrow money to achieve that return: education does
not need to be a public service. In the concluding part of my text
"Silence=Debt," I tried to show how the entire US higher education
system has gradually been reshaped by this notion of human capital. Just
one of the results is the current intense competition between
universities for places on various highly abstract and dubious rankings,
maybe even including this one.
In the debt society, ROI=IOU.
I sure am glad I got out of Berkeley before they extracted the current
sky-high tuition out of me.
best, Brian
# distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission
# <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism,
# collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets
# more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l
# archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: [email protected]
