After the Ukrainian election it's time to respond to this.  I'm also surprised 
this isn't more lively on Nettime.

I'm glad to hear Alex describe Putin as revanchist, because that's exactly what 
he is.  Putin's critiques of liberal democracy sound a lot like those the 
fascists used to spout, and for being accurate they are no less appalling.  
That is, the critique is applied from an anti-humanist angle, almost futurist 
in its appeal to mechanical alignment of people behind state machines, which 
are confused entirely for the major nationalist ethnic groupings they have 
subsumed.  Ethnicities without a state machine, of course, are superfluous and 
need not apply for ration cards.

The ethnic nationalism rising in Europe today is indeed frightening.  To 
paraphrase what I read somewhere: it would be easy to redraw the map of Europe 
along ethnic lines today, as long as you were ready to draw it in blood.  
That's why the knee-jerk support for separatist movements on the left is so 
dangerous; nationalism has as much in common with imperialism as it does with 
anti-imperialism.

I mean, why a separate Quebec but not a separate state for every First Nations 
identity? How would Eastern Canada get carved up if every language got its own 
parliament?  The recent attempt to impose a "values charter" in Quebec (which 
banned hijabs and yamulkes among a broad class of state workers) should cause 
any left-thinker to pause before endorsing nationalism of any kind.

And really, how is the Front National of today, or Golden Dawn for that matter, 
different from a separatist movement, yearning to breathe free of the 
capitalist chains of the Euro?

Meanwhile the detentes among Russia and China, Russia and India, Russia and 
Iran are starting to draw a three-dimensional-chessboard in which non- or 
pseudo-democracies are lining up against liberal democracies alarmingly 
(Vietnam notwithstanding).

The recent kerfuffle about Hitler and Prince Charles should alarm everyone - on 
the one hand, a royal figure of no democratic legitimacy who has the power to 
stir hearts and minds in the UK, should he so desire, against another country; 
and on the other, a Russian media that is willing to paint the British 
establishment as collaborationist with the Nazi Party they suffered so heavily 
to destroy.  The America-first movement in the 1930's had a similar foolish 
impulse, refusing to protect the British Empire which was as bad, they said, as 
the Nazis, or worse.  A few million Jews might beg to differ, if they hadn't 
been burned in ovens.

Russia Today has been quite successful, it seems, in feeding the external left 
a line of bullshit they can use in their anti-Western campaigns that haven't 
been updated ideologically since the Battle in Seattle.  The trouble is, 
Putin's solutions are worse than the problem.

Yes, The West is neo-colonialist.  Yes, they use violence to enforce their will 
on the weak when economics don't do the job alone.  Yes, the Euro offer to 
Ukraine is laced with capitalist aggression.  Therefore, support Putin?!

Does the left really believe that Barack Obama is a neocon on the order of 
Bush, and even if he was, would that be reason enough to side with Putin?  A 
man who outlawed "Gay Propaganda" before the Olympics?!  What is the Putin line 
on African-American equality?!

The victory of right-wing anti-humanist (anti-gay, anti-feminist despite Ms 
LePen, anti-multiculture) parties - parties of like mind with Putin - gives 
warning that laughing at Europe's failure in Ukraine is not solution enough to 
the current crisis.

At least we can hope that the extreme right-wing parties will never cooperate 
with each other; this gives them a great disadvantage globally.  I mean, 
really, did the Ukrainian Nazis expect the German Nazis to embrace them?  Will 
the Tea Party ever cheer for Putin?

- Flick Harrison
-- 
* WHERE'S MY ARTICLE, WORLD? http://wikipedia.org/wiki/Flick_Harrison 

* FLICK's WEBSITE: 
http://www.flickharrison.com

??? Grab this Headline Animator


#  distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission
#  <nettime>  is a moderated mailing list for net criticism,
#  collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets
#  more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l
#  archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: [email protected]

Reply via email to