This is exactly the issue - the (assumed) need for interpretation.
If there is a small number of potential interpreters who really
understand issues (1 in 1000?), and even smaller number among those who
are willing to interpret to the public for altruistic reasons (1 in
1,000,000?), then it is trivial to hijack the interpreted message and
drawn it into whatever narrative the highest bidder needs, which is what
is going on today.
I think that there may be a critical fraction value (CFV), the number of
people who understand some issue, and if that number is above CVF, then
the population cannot be easily manipulated by the bandwidth owners.
Looking at the past, I'll make a wild guess that CVF is somewhere around
2-5%.
Getting this number up, closer to CVF, is generally termed 'education'.
Regarding crypto and the information hygiene, I think that we are
currently far below CVF. If you start from the assumption that this
cannot be fixed, then there is no hope.
On 1/4/15, 10:45, John Hopkins wrote:
particular technological concept is any solution -- I think more
principled understandings that are not so difficult to grasp, when
presented in the right way, can address this problem. Given that the
tech is predicated on systems theory -- perhaps some critical systems
thinking could go a long way in allowing people to understand many of
the power relationships that are operational in the present situation.
# distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission
# <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism,
# collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets
# more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l
# archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: [email protected]
