Rise of the Internet and other personal devices
for handy-witted exposition has affirmed wealth
accumulation by digital technology's inventors,
producers and distributors, and thereby
neoliberalism and ordoliberalism in shrewd
disguises especially that of digitally empowered
expositors quite satisfied at reaching far more
consumers than by paper and ink and talks,
thereby empowering (i.e, enslaving, aka
educating) consumers who are taught and
instructed and seduced to affirm intellectual
wealth accumulation at their student-indebted
expense and thrillingly diverting fandom of very
own smartest of personal devices and brilliantly
cogitating bold-name digitally dropping heros,
heros of dual-hatted complicity with neo-ordo
contributors to intellectual dole, aka socialism
of the top 5% of finest minds social engineering
for <1% grant-masters and prize bestowers.
At 10:22 AM 4/25/2016, you wrote:
> Now, you can respond like the Regulation
school or even Deleuze and Guattari, and say
that capitalism continually changes certain
axiomatic propositions, in order that its major
principle of endless accumulation through labor
exploitation can continue. That's what I think.
But such a statement still demands that one
understand each new bundle of axioms, with its
inner variations and their political origins,
as well as their specific consequences. I don't
see any other way to confront neoliberalism.
Thank you Brian..
Neo-liberalismÂ’s Version of Original Sin-
(-Sing of human unsuccess in a rapture of distressÂ…- WH Auden)
<...>
# distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission
# <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism,
# collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets
# more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l
# archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: [email protected]
# @nettime_bot tweets mail w/ sender unless #ANON is in Subject:
