The more common match term for "protocol power" as coined by the abstract seems to be the anglo-saxon "multistakeholderism" governance model. It is deeply embedded in their political culture. I assume it stems from a more corporatist past.
/A Am 31.01.2017 um 06:58 schrieb Morlock Elloi: > Isn't the primary (and only?) purpose of these protocols to reduce the > number of protocoliriat (TM) (the number of people involved), and > simplify the control? # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: [email protected] # @nettime_bot tweets mail w/ sender unless #ANON is in Subject:
