While this has turned into an interesting discussion on the (non?)future of
AI, it's important to remind ourselves that what Zeynep is describing (and
control societies in general) don't rely on the existence of advanced AI to
work.

The power of control societies emerges from the historical conjuncture of
biopower (the institutional collection/management of data concerning
populations) and computation (the automation of data/information processing
that can result in then dynamic modulation of control / the exercise of
power).

On Nov 2, 2017 8:54 AM, "charlie derr" <[email protected]> wrote:

> On 11/02/2017 05:29 AM, Vincent Van Uffelen wrote:
> > Nevertheless, it [AI] remains a very powerful tool, and it is in the
> > hands of a very few (and their software engineer/programmer management
> > layer).
>
> While it's still in the embryonic stages, I just wanted to mention a
> rather ambitious effort to change this reality using blockchain
> technology and implementing via open source code:
>
> https://singularitynet.io
>
> https://medium.com/ben-goertzel-on-singularitynet
>
> Their whitepaper is due out any day now.
>
>      best,
>           ~c
>
>
> #  distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission
> #  <nettime>  is a moderated mailing list for net criticism,
> #  collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets
> #  more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l
> #  archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: [email protected]
> #  @nettime_bot tweets mail w/ sender unless #ANON is in Subject:
>
#  distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission
#  <nettime>  is a moderated mailing list for net criticism,
#  collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets
#  more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l
#  archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: [email protected]
#  @nettime_bot tweets mail w/ sender unless #ANON is in Subject:

Reply via email to