I agree with Brian. These folks aren’t alt-right. I can’t pin down the
politics precisely but Brian gets the Invisible Committee thing right.
They’re probably somewhere around leftcom/anarcho-communist/communization.
I’m pretty sure they’re somehow connected to the Woodbine collective in
Ridgewood, Queens. I picked up a copy of the pamphlet when I was at a
workshop there.

On Sat, Nov 10, 2018 at 7:26 PM Brian Holmes <bhcontinentaldr...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> This pamphlet reads like an American redux of The Invisible Committee. Its
> concepts and general outlook go back to a text like "Civil War" in Tiqqun
> #2. Its production values are within reach of anyone who can afford a
> laptop, an Amazon bucket and a domain name. Its imagery is of a piece with
> the rest; and by looking around on the web you can see that it was
> originally published as an orange-tinted book, so maybe the pseudo-print
> aesthetic has a simple explanation.
>
> The idea that it's a psychologist's honey-pot crafted to catch the naive
> is far-fetched. This is anarchy. The positions codified by Tiqqun and
> popularized by the Invisible Committee have become widespread through the
> experiences of Exarchia, the ZAD, Standing Rock and many others, with the
> Palestinian resistance and the Kurdish war of independence blazing in the
> background. The elemental question to be asked is, do I make common cause
> with these authors? A corollary line of questioning would be: Is civil war
> inevitable in the capitalist democracies? Could it have positive effects?
>
> I say no on all three counts. The serious threat of civil war comes from
> the extreme right, they have both the numbers and the guns. Throw gasoline
> on that fire and it will explode in your face. Punching a Nazi has become
> legitimate, yes, and it's a good thing. The legitimacy, I mean. That makes
> it possible to gather large numbers for anti-fascist demos and to seek
> criminal prosecution against the extremists, while city governments topple
> the statues of racists and carry out investigations of police abuse, etc.
> The rule of law is definitely not all it's cracked up to be, but its
> absence would be worse. The potential of life degrades exactly to the
> extent that societies are not able to keep violence of all kinds in check.
> In militarized countries like the US it has degraded a lot, and the point
> is to reverse the process, not accelerate it.
>
> The really weird thing here is the typeface, for sure. I think that in the
> age of atrophied thought and controlled imaginations there is an
> unconscious sexualized attraction to the passions of war, symbolized by the
> aesthetics of the 1930s. In this sense I agree with the gist of Ted's
> analysis: the intention is that of normalizing a largely fantasmatic
> violence, without realizing how enabling the practice of that fantasy can
> be for the hard right.
>
> Where I agree with Ian is that we do have to discuss these things. Energy
> companies ARE expanding their operations. Cities ARE being smashed by
> hurricanes. US troops ARE camped at the border with Mexico (and possibly
> militias too). How do you respond to a dystopian reality? What is the best
> strategy? With whom can you carry it out? How can you bring it up to scale?
> These are the questions we should be answering.
>
> best, Brian
> #  distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission
> #  <nettime>  is a moderated mailing list for net criticism,
> #  collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets
> #  more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l
> #  archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nett...@kein.org
> #  @nettime_bot tweets mail w/ sender unless #ANON is in Subject:

-- 
Justin Charles
862.216.2467
#  distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission
#  <nettime>  is a moderated mailing list for net criticism,
#  collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets
#  more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l
#  archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nett...@kein.org
#  @nettime_bot tweets mail w/ sender unless #ANON is in Subject:

Reply via email to