There are simpler ways of viewing this:
1. The 'complexity' is so complex that individual actors do not matter
any more, and what is there is new emergent phenomenon so complex it's
nearly impossible to understand; we need to spend our lives analyzing it
while in semi-catatonic paralysis.
2. Complexity is sleigh of hand used to shield actors from
responsibility. It's a new deity, akin to the traditional ones, in whose
name atrocities were allowed to happen, as nothing else could be done
without being blasphemous. It became a classical religion, removing
responsibility from individuals, introducing Fate 2.0, and
self-reinforcing as it prevents one from going into dangerous and
correct direction of action, becoming self-preservation vehicle. If you
think that today's highly liberal educated philosophiles are immune to
such basic religious contamination, you're an idiot.
Which one is correct? Let's see what those that can do, I mean powers
that be: when they don't like something, they target and kill, maim and
imprison *individuals*. From heads of state to inconvenient loudmouths.
Somehow they don't let the complexity overwhelm them into perpetual
ruminations in their cabinets. And it works, perfectly: the power of
dominant powers that be is more solid today than it ever was.
This should give you a hint to the correct answer.
---
ru·mi·na·tion/ˌro͞oməˈnāSH(ə)n/
noun
1. ...
2. the action of chewing the cud.
Also see https://i.imgur.com/PVpHtDM.jpg
* The chains of interactions have grown longer. Many (social and
ecological) systems used to be relatively local phenomena have become
# distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission
# <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism,
# collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets
# more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l
# archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nett...@kein.org
# @nettime_bot tweets mail w/ sender unless #ANON is in Subject: