Government-privileged press is rabidly disclaiming its role in
sacrificing Assange, WikiLeaks, Snowden, Winner, Hale, et al, to
maintain its hegemony in deciding what the public is allowed to know.
Shame on its shamelessness of guilt-avoiding complicity.
What Assange is accused of should be seen as a starting point for
what needs to be expanded well beyond where cosseted and cowed press
-- overly-lawyered and profit-seeking, forever seeking official
approval to protect its prestige and business -- will not venture.
So too for researchers, academics, NGOs, even, pardon rudeness, these
very strutting, cowardly, verbose, media-quoting fora.
National security ideology is a long-lived pharma insistently
dispensed to eagerly downed by anxious and insecure populace,
especially by the highly intelligent who gain their rewards by
obedience and comforting critique to assure fees, sales, perqs,
medical care and pensions.
Guardian, NYT, WaPo, bigger the name, bigger the complicity in "not
going too far," that is bypassing their restrictions. Oh well, press
religion gets constitutional access to secretkeeping sanctums with
instructions on how to massage the body politic's strictly enforced
info consumption. Headlines and bylines rule the flow.
# distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission
# <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism,
# collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets
# more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l
# archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: [email protected]
# @nettime_bot tweets mail w/ sender unless #ANON is in Subject:
