Partisanism makes the world easier but does not get it right. You have to simply consider this from a political standpoint and just view the moves of the players.
a. What does he sacrifice by proposing himself? b. What do MPs sacrifice if they support the opposition? a. nothing at all b. everything It is an "offer" designed to not be accepted but to appeal to his electorate. In particular with an upcoming reelections perspective it is clear why no one could be in. Furthermore, if they get "no-deal" the partisan Labour rejection of the withdrawal agreement would be of Corbyn's responsibility. The reason why minority fractions such as DUP got so much power to derail negotiations stems from the lack of cross-partisan consensus. Here the question is if we blame the UK political system or Corbyn. Why did Labour block the withdrawal agreement adoption? To stop Brexit? Nah... Unlike the SNP or LibDem his position is completely unclear and non-constructive. Am 19.08.19 um 12:57 schrieb Roman Seidl: > > > >> Corbyn proposing Corbyn is no serious offer. He puts nothing on the >> table. It is quite reckless how he abuses the crisis. > Thanks for demonstrating how the demonization of Corbyn works. # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: [email protected] # @nettime_bot tweets mail w/ sender unless #ANON is in Subject:
