Ignoring that this is one of the most classist, awful things I've seen proposed, you're making big assumptions that everyone has the same learning styles and abilities to pick up languages. Intellect doesn't require one to be bilingual, and bringing up IQ is a suspect, arbitrary, and meaningless measure of intelligence.
I see you also don't give any care to poor or marginalized people who don't have access to good education, tutors, technology, or other environments where learning a dead language would be convenient. Only rich people get to participate in discourse! What's the revolution here? Upholding the ruling class? Renée Lynn Reizman On Sun, Nov 10, 2019 at 3:00 AM <nettime-l-requ...@mail.kein.org> wrote: > Send nettime-l mailing list submissions to > nettime-l@mail.kein.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > nettime-l-requ...@mail.kein.org > > You can reach the person managing the list at > nettime-l-ow...@mail.kein.org > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of nettime-l digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Latin as revolutionary act? (Morlock Elloi) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Sat, 09 Nov 2019 14:48:36 -0800 > From: Morlock Elloi <morlockel...@gmail.com> > To: nettime-l@mail.kein.org > Subject: <nettime> Latin as revolutionary act? > Message-ID: <5dc74244.8090...@gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > > What would be consequences of using Latin language among > group/clique/cabal/underground/elite for discourse, publishing, idea > exchange, tweets? (let's ignore for the moment how does one get the > above set to learn Latin) > > First of all, the noise goes down, as there is intellectual effort > barrier involved. Feeble-minded, distracted, low IQ, vacuous, and other > nobodies are out. It would be like early Internet (1990s) - only nice > and interesting people, no rabble. Only more resilient, because the > 'price' of learning tongue will never go down, unlike computer equipment > and access. > > Second, the cross-pollution from deluge of mechanically augmented media > firehoses goes way down. Language is the medium, and, of course, the > medium is the message. It's much harder to influence those thinking in a > foreign tongue. > > Third, the isolated hermetic nature of such setup would allow thinking > to mature, being spared from cretinous cheering and booing from the > unwashed crowd. At the same time, it can use modern networking > technology to attract interest globally. > > > Perdidi unum in mediis soccus lauandi, et iam sentire perfecta! > > > > ------------------------------ > > # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission > # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, > # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets > # more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l > > End of nettime-l Digest, Vol 146, Issue 17 > ****************************************** >
# distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nett...@kein.org # @nettime_bot tweets mail w/ sender unless #ANON is in Subject:
