Brian at his best, thank you so much for this!

Best,

Seb

> On 7 Jan 2021, at 19:25, Brian Holmes <bhcontinentaldr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> On Thu, Jan 7, 2021 at 2:32 AM Felix Stalder <fe...@openflows.com 
> <mailto:fe...@openflows.com>> wrote:
> I followed, like many others I presume, yesterday's events in Washington
> on TV (cnn) and on social media at the same time. And it seems pretty
> clear that this event was made on, through and for social media....
>  [...lots of other very cogent observations here...]
> I'm far away, maybe miss-reading this entire thing.
> 
> It's too early to tell. However there is an opposite interpretation.
> 
> In my view, far from being a harbinger of possibly worse threats to come, 
> yesterday's events were the most positive thing that could have happened. I 
> had hoped - dreamed - that we would see something exactly like this.
> 
> The reason why is that through these events, we as a country left the world 
> of "harbingers" and "possible threats" behind. Simultaneously, we left behind 
> the pretense that populist Republicans are "merely" engaged in political 
> theater. The day began with the usual push-the-limits posturing from Senator 
> Ted Cruz and his allies: yet another page from the rhetorical playbook 
> developed by Newt Gingrinch in the early 1990s. But then the play-acting 
> devolved into an ugly insurrection carried out by crude, stupid and very 
> obviously manipulated people. They were directly incited by the highest 
> powers, via social media for sure, and television, and radio, and print 
> journalism, and above all by the hottest channel of all: live rallies. The 
> theater had consequences. The possible became real. And so a choice between 
> conflicting realities could finally occur.
> 
> Amazingly, no bomb exploded, no automatic weapons came out at dusk, there was 
> no massacre. The pretense of "political theater" that fomented the uprising 
> also took the place of, and disallowed, any serious planning for collective 
> violence. Instead the entire country got a close look at an inchoate, yet 
> very dangerous mob whose worldview is paranoid and delusional. Sure, we had 
> seen these folks already, many times. Yet this time there was no equivocation 
> as to who was leading. When Pence and McConnell took their last-minute stand 
> in favor of the Constitution, Trump sent his thugs to oppose them. And with 
> their actions, Trump's people - the real, unequivocal "deplorables" - finally 
> lanced the boil of Trumpism.
> 
> When the Western forests burned and smoke hung for weeks over Seattle and San 
> Francisco, it became obvious to a majority of Americans that climate change 
> was real. Similarly, when the windows were shattered at the Capitol, it 
> became obvious that a politics based on staged and calculated insurrectionary 
> rhetoric leads to real violence and institutional breakdown.
> 
> Rather than subjecting it to a media-theoretic analysis, I think it would be 
> realistic to see yesterday's electoral count event as a "total social fact." 
> The phrase by Marcel Mauss refers to moments of collective ritual in which 
> the pragmatic administration of functions coincides with the charismatic or 
> magical expression of values. For Mauss this is a dynamic ritual with all the 
> density, complexity and precarity of lived experience. It is a real force 
> because it tests out the validity of social fictions. It is a total fact 
> because it upholds, but to some extent also transforms, a society's core 
> affective and cognitive assumptions about what the world is and how it works.
> 
> The pragmatic function of yesterday's certification ritual was to confirm the 
> peaceful transferral of state power. Yet what it became, dynamically, was a 
> challenge to and subsequent re-affirmation of all the procedures, values and 
> aspirations attached to the society-wide practice of democracy. This was not 
> a monolithic, mythical, predetermined ceremony, even though that was what 
> everyone was fearfully hoping it would be. Instead it was dynamic, 
> open-ended, touch and go, extremely vulnerable. And look at what it actually 
> did. 
> 
> It reconfirmed, in the evening, the about-face of political power that had 
> occured in the morning, when the results from Georgia came through. In this 
> way, it opened up the possibility for a Democratic administration to actually 
> legislate: to move transformative laws through both the House and the Senate. 
> Not just Trump, but three decades of Republican mendacity and opportunism 
> were pushed aside. And that event did not merely happen over social media, or 
> on talk radio, or on the Hannity show. It was not just another piece of 
> calculated political theater. It was a society-wide event: a total social 
> fact.
> 
> Not only that, but from the media-theoretic viewpoint, something extremely 
> interesting did occur: Twitter censored Trump and blocked his communications 
> for 12 hours. The anarcho-capitalist media took one giant step towards 
> accepting their integration in the overall political process. 
> 
> So we dodged a bullet yesterday, for sure. And something a lot more important 
> may potentially have happened.
> 
> There comes a point where you have to be counter-factual, you have to engage 
> in what Mauss calls "magical thinking." You have to take a role in a theater 
> that really does have consequences. That tipping-point is now. I will 
> participate in the collective actions of a society that starts to reverse the 
> tremendous harms it has been committing for decades and centuries. I will 
> help to transform the pragmatic administration of social functions.
> 
> all the best, Brian
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> | |||||||||||||||||| http://felix.openflows.com <http://felix.openflows.com/> 
> |
> | Open PGP | http://felix.openflows.com/pgp.txt 
> <http://felix.openflows.com/pgp.txt> |
> 
> #  distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission
> #  <nettime>  is a moderated mailing list for net criticism,
> #  collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets
> #  more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l 
> <http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l>
> #  archive: http://www.nettime.org <http://www.nettime.org/> contact: 
> nett...@kein.org <mailto:nett...@kein.org>
> #  @nettime_bot tweets mail w/ sender unless #ANON is in Subject:
> #  distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission
> #  <nettime>  is a moderated mailing list for net criticism,
> #  collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets
> #  more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l
> #  archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nett...@kein.org
> #  @nettime_bot tweets mail w/ sender unless #ANON is in Subject:

#  distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission
#  <nettime>  is a moderated mailing list for net criticism,
#  collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets
#  more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l
#  archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nett...@kein.org
#  @nettime_bot tweets mail w/ sender unless #ANON is in Subject:

Reply via email to