Far-right Newsmax accidentally lets viewers know that war can't make us proud 
<https://email.mg2.substack.com/c/eJw9ksly4jAQhp8G33Bp8XrwIcNWUGOYyjCQzMUlS40RyLIji2Dz9JHD1FRJOnR_vaj_5sxC1Zgha5vOeuNT2KGFTMO9U2AtGO_WgSmkyDCmlEbIE1kgcBImnuyKkwGomVSZNTfw2lupJGdWNvo7ADkMe-eMBWUogiQ4MR5R4KIMSVqWKEBpxE8hK5912U1I0Bwy-AQzNBo8lZ2tbbsJfZmQpTtjU749wwBdDdpvTOWMrbsnZqZGVmc7HZGa9VPGuRSgLVNqmLqPuCRL21xBT-gchg3m5DC8EXVdX5o-3-eP_PF-_znb3Eu6Rf_sKJ_nKN-_BLm8S3ZcopHdXtbh9pGTfP_eO77lNJc7ubmL49o6tt_N__Rrx3N6kI6XfJU-xAwPf4_Li1ipz1JuUl_XP_ZmBofX1YdZ_H68qd3rL7lZHA5hs1wwpJL19WOX7qr9wg05I4hglBCKI5LixMc-D7GIEcRIhIyHJI5IGScU4TRMMI0TMglQXRG_u5WdZfzq86b2TFYBGOtcfRe4ofhajXIVzlfftLRDAZqVCsRTSfvch29tiwo0GLcnomA2G7uIaYQjHMbkKZyTOkA0GJv0XFHRuCid_dfpC1M3zXw>

11-minute Yes Men prank on Tom Basile show emphasizes what $2.4 trillion could 
have been spent on instead

https://theyesmen.org/project/warisallyouneed/broadcast

Listen 
<https://email.mg2.substack.com/c/eJwlkEGO5CAMRU9T7BJhSEJqwWI2c43IAXcFNZAInKnO7Yd0SZZl2f769nPI9NrLZY-9srjTwtdBNtO7RmKmIs5KZQneAmitJym8HTzM4yxCXb4KUcIQLZeTxHGuMTjksOdfgWxrIDbrJ41KDQaeZKYZFIImp_EpjZtWB_TxxdMHyo4s_aNy7ZlEtBvzUR_6z0P9bfF-v3smTNuZMPdfqbXoCHX3VFtZD3IBY1fo2At3mP3VrcFtccUzdUfB_F27-6-EPyJYJRXIWWmY1BPmHno3gjeSjPQjulGZSa1m1hKe4wzazOoxyPRSfT3Xyui-e7cnUeyLqHAb_dQBY-xzvCksbZbOHPhaKOMayX8A8QfzL7LlRZlKw-8XZHtfYfQEE4xGfXg0goPUw32kaKZ-b6pseaOLaqL8H2pslGY>
 to Douglas Rushkoff and the Yes Men’s Andy Bichlbaum discuss Saturday’s prank 
<https://email.mg2.substack.com/c/eJw9kMtuxCAMRb9mWEY88iALFt30NyKCnQwtgQicTvP3JROpEkLY5ur6HmcJ15RPs6dC7LomOnc0EV8lIBFmdhTMkwcjhFKq5wxMC0J3mvkyLRlxsz4Yygey_ZiDd5Z8im8Br98EexqpQWEPo7K94laN2sHCEUcNWnI9L7evPcBjdGjwB_OZIrJgnkR7eaiPh_ysh554YtkwNimvtd5z-kJH9fWy2RcbwpmOiAi1M-dkwdkayhvJpeBaKtHLUehGNK4TMHAcOHTWdXLo5TxoxcXYaaEGLR8t31bZlGMuZN1349LGslkRM9XRb2mrVRPDFXiqs-2Ins4Jo50Dws2CbqJvOtOKEXMlDZMlc20xqF70ohvkHb3CarlqryVZNYVUVdH8x_0DH8-M0g>
 on the Team Human podcast. Also, do not confuse Basile’s “America Right Now” 
with Chris Morris's "The Day Today 
<https://email.mg2.substack.com/c/eJwlUMluhDAM_RpyREkMJHPIoVU1PXW59oSyeBhUCCgxbfn7hkGyLEvPT2_xlnBY0m7WJRM7Vk_7iibib56QCBPbMqZ-DEYIAOg4C6YJQreajbm_JcTZjpOhtCFbNzeN3tK4xAeBlzfB7sYrcB1IsBo5BH9zjZXCQ-uEsDcr_alrtzBi9GjwB9O-RGSTuROtuYKnSl7L7MtGW-2wnAmeP7rXz8v721cFV6rgpWGjkVwKriWITl6ErkXtWxEUR8VDa30rVSed0sDFpdUClJZVw-dB1nlzmaz_rv0ys2QGxEQF-suNnaY6TkeyvmDzFkfae4zWTRjO0HRW96ihHzBiKpWG3pI5XCjoRCdaJc-MpZWGQ3OYZEU0LIUVDd1xxzxj_Af68IHL>,"
 though it’s every bit as ridiculous.

Late last week, NewsmaxTV's Tom Basile 
<https://email.mg2.substack.com/c/eJwlUMtuhDAM_JrNEeUBJHvIoT30C3pHgQy7UUNAiemWv29YJMuSZc94ZiZHeKz5sNtaiJ1toGODTXiVCCJkthfkIXgrhFKq58zb1gvTGRbKMGdgcSFayjvYto8xTI7Cmt4AXs8Ee9pRGi_nFm72XENXGsxqNs71uGuM_fXX7T4gTbD4RT7WBBbtk2grN_Vxk1-16BVORc20LnX6Xpfh05UQwYKVXApupBK9vAvTiGbqhNccmvvOTZ3UvRy1UVzcOyOUNvLW8uUhm7KPhdz0c3KybB9Aprr6K62LsUnx9DTU3bKnQMeA5MYIf9mlK7R3AMMDCbmG6QdH9lShVS960Wl5uat5tFy1p0hWn_q1opKlJw6UBekf6ciCOg>
 wanted to book his old friend Paul Wolfowitz for a show called “America Right 
Now,” to talk about Biden's withdrawal from Afghanistan.

He ended up with the Yes Men instead 
<https://email.mg2.substack.com/c/eJw9kMtuxCAMRb9mWEY88iALFt30NyKCnQwtgQicTvP3JROpEkLY5ur6HmcJ15RPs6dC7LomOnc0EV8lIBFmdhTMkwcjhFKq5wxMC0J3mvkyLRlxsz4Yygey_ZiDd5Z8im8Br98EexqpQWEPo7K94laN2sHCEUcNWnI9L7evPcBjdGjwB_OZIrJgnkR7eaiPh_ysh554YtkwNimvtd5z-kJH9fWy2RcbwpmOiAi1M-dkwdkayhvJpeBaKtHLUehGNK4TMHAcOHTWdXLo5TxoxcXYaaEGLR8t31bZlGMuZN1349LGslkRM9XRb2mrVRPDFXiqs-2Ins4Jo50Dws2CbqJvOtOKEXMlDZMlc20xqF70ohvkHb3CarlqryVZNYVUVdH8x_0DH8-M0g>.
 Here's how 
<https://email.mg2.substack.com/c/eJw9kMtuhDAMRb-GLFEeQDKLLLrpb6A8DBNNSGhi2vL3DYNUybJl2db1Pc4grLmces8VyZVmPHfQCX5qBEQo5KhQ5uA1Y0KIiRKvB8_UqEio81IANhOixnIA2Q8bgzMYcnof0LbGyFM_HnLkC1jprXODoYo6A-PgLFfTIKy5dc3hAyQHGr6hnDkBifqJuNdOfHT8swU-4YS6QepzWVsfwZTUqs35lRcswb1qx8VivgLKiQTNKWdUccEm_mCqZ70bmZcUJPWjcSOXE7dSCcoeo2JCKt4NdFt5Xw9b0bhX7_JGil4BCrbRbx1MjH2Kl9O5zbYjBTxnSMZG8DcEvFG-scwrJCgNsZ8N6usLKSY2sVHy23OjNFAxXE-SJupzu0r63-cftaOJrg>.
 Andy's plan was to switch “Wolfowitz” with a “colleague 
<https://email.mg2.substack.com/c/eJwlUMtuxCAM_Jrl1ohHCOyBQy_9jYiAk0UlEIHTNP36ko1kWX6NPDPOIiy5nGbLFcmVRjw3MAmOGgERCtkrlDF4w5gQYqDEm94zLTUJdZwLwGpDNFh2INs-xeAshpzeANrOGHkZGPjEJ8snJhho-1RqcF4KOlnpnr2d77929wGSAwM_UM6cgETzQtzqQ3w--FeL4zg6C6HLZWndVvIcIlyV3ePHkeOcj4B_bUCC4ZQzqrlgA38y3bHOSeYVBUW9tE5y1TgpLSh7Ss2E0vzR03XhXd2nitZ9dy6vpJgFoGBb_dbextileIkc227dU8BzhGSnCP7Wj7eLb0fGBRKU5q4fLZqLhRIDG5hU_JbbDOqp6C-SpD31uaGSwRecUFdI_4i9h5o>”
 from the American Enterprise Institute at the last minute — and that would be 
Andy under an assumed name, wearing big silly glasses like all of the guests on 
Basile's show seem to do.

But when, two minutes before the 12:04pm EST Saturday slot, Andy logged on and 
told producers that Wolfowitz was having trouble with wifi and wanted him to do 
it instead, the producers refused, and suggested just patching Wolfowitz 
through on the phone — which is how this became the very first time the Yes Men 
impersonated an actual person, rather than simply 
<https://email.mg2.substack.com/c/eJw9UEtuxCAMPc2wjPglMAsW3fQaEQEnQ0sgAqdNbl8ykSpZlq1n632cRVhyOc2WK5KrjXhuYBL81giIUMheoYzBG8aEEAMl3kjPdK9JqONcAFYbosGyA9n2KQZnMeT0fqDtjJGXcVwq6foJZknpPDs1a60nZiXA4J2abl67-wDJgYEfKGdOQKJ5IW71IT4e_LMVvuCEukLqclnavpX8BQ7bBMeREwmGU86o5oIN_Ml0xzrXM68oKOp763quBj4pLSh79poJpflD0nXhXd2nitZ9dy6vpJgFoGCDjiptjF2Kl7WxYeueAp4jJDtF8LdrvLN75zAukKC0TP1o0VwqlBjYwHrFb5MtFkmFvESSRupz-0rm39gf1NmE5A>
 inventing 
<https://email.mg2.substack.com/c/eJw9UEtuxSAMPM1jGfENyYJFN71GxMcvj5ZABE7b3L6kkSpZ1lj2aDzjLcJa6mn20pBcbcFzB5PhuyVAhEqOBnWJwTAmhBgpCUYGNqmJxLY8K8BmYzJYDyD74VL0FmPJfwTazxh5GaVnP3NBx_HZwcy0ki7A-PRcSue0vXXtESJkDwa-oJ4lA0nmhbi3h3h78Pde-IIT2gZ5KHXt817LB3jsKJdkK7gjptBINJxyRicu2MhnNg1s8IoFTUHToKxXXI_c6UlQNquJCT3xh6Tbyod2uIbWfw6-bKSaFaBiX_00aVMacrocLn23HTniuUC2LkG4zeMd4V8cywoZao82LBbN9YUWIxuZ0vz22tORVMjrSdJFQ-msbP79_QLybIbU>
 one 
<https://email.mg2.substack.com/c/eJw9UEtuxCAMPc2wjPiEQBYsuuk1IgKehJZABE6nuX3JRKpkWbaerfdxFmHJ5TR7rkiuNuG5g0nwqhEQoZCjQpmCN4wJIQZKvOk901KTUKdnAdhsiAbLAWQ_5hicxZDT-4G2M0ZWo2BW1AvaS_CWM62d6OVzBDUoNVrLbl57-ADJgYEfKGdOQKJZEff6EB8P_tkKVzihbpC6XJa27yV_gcM2-fyaZ0eC4ZQzqrlgAx-Z7ljnJPOKQuOX1kmuBj4rLSgbpWZCaf7o6bbwrh5zReu-O5c3UswCULBBv7W3MXYpXt6mhm1HCnhOkOwcwd-28Q7vHcS0QILSQvWTRXOpUGJgA5OK3y5bLj0V_SWSNFKf21cy_87-AEsOhDY>.
 

In the 11-minute live broadcast (video here 
<https://email.mg2.substack.com/c/eJw9kMtuhSAQhp9GloaLKGfBopu-BkEYPbQIBsZz6tsXa9KETObC5J__cxZhzeXUe65IrmDw3EEneNcIiFDIUaGY4DVjQoiREq8Hz5RUJFSzFIDNhqixHED2Y47BWQw5_S3Q9o2Rp6aCS0e5ctQLJyxbYBm9aMnD8gHccuvawwdIDjS8oJw5AYn6ibjXTnx0_LM9fMIJdYPU57K2ei_5Cxy27G1LqDbGMx8JwLdODC_ouOR0Ltl6Z5u7oDnljCou2MgfTPWsd5L5icJEvbRO8mnk86QEZQ-pmJgU7wa6rbyvx1zRuu_e5Y0UvQIUbKOfOjTNPsXLuWmz7UgBTwPJzhH8DQVvtH-YzAoJSkPujUV9XTGJkY1MTvxm0KgNVAzXkaSJ-ty2kv73_QvvGI95>),
 full transcript there and below), Andy as Wolfowitz offered Basile's viewers a 
brand-new "conservative angle" for criticizing Biden's withdrawal: that without 
a war — even a doomed and failing 20-year war — Americans have nothing to be 
proud of, since we lag so far behind other rich nations on health care, 
infrastructure, education, elder care, food options, income, social mobility, 
and so on.

"A sitting president, in the office of president, unnecessarily ended a war — 
leaving Americans with nothing else to be proud of," said Andy. "That's the 
real crime, Tom."

Basile lapped it up without batting an eye — for 11 full minutes.
Near the end, Andy offered Basile's viewers a suggestion: next time we think of 
spending $2.4 trillion on a war, let's spend it instead on something we can be 
proud of — infrastructure, health care, social mobility, education, etc.

Throughout the interview, Basile kept trying to steer his “old friend” back 
from domestic policy to the question of what to do now in Afghanistan. Andy 
admitted that we should certainly evacuate "every single Afghan man, woman, and 
child" from Afghanistan, but that it would be impossible to make things right 
after a 20-year failure of a war. Andy then pivoted back to the ways we could 
have spent $2.4 trillion.

One weird thing: Tom Basile actually knows Wolfowitz, as he mentioned during 
the broadcast. Andy hadn't planned to impersonate him, of course, so he didn't 
bother listening to his voice — and we're pretty sure he sounds nothing like 
him. Yet Basile never noticed. Could Basile's complete lack of observational 
ability have anything to do with his horrible politics?

Here’s the complete transcript of the broadcast 
<https://email.mg2.substack.com/c/eJw9kMtuxCAMRb9mWEY88iALFt30NyKCnQwtgQicTvP3JROpEkLY5ur6HmcJ15RPs6dC7LomOnc0EV8lIBFmdhTMkwcjhFKq5wxMC0J3mvkyLRlxsz4Yygey_ZiDd5Z8im8Br98EexqpQWEPo7K94laN2sHCEUcNWnI9L7evPcBjdGjwB_OZIrJgnkR7eaiPh_ysh554YtkwNimvtd5z-kJH9fWy2RcbwpmOiAi1M-dkwdkayhvJpeBaKtHLUehGNK4TMHAcOHTWdXLo5TxoxcXYaaEGLR8t31bZlGMuZN1349LGslkRM9XRb2mrVRPDFXiqs-2Ins4Jo50Dws2CbqJvOtOKEXMlDZMlc20xqF70ohvkHb3CarlqryVZNYVUVdH8x_0DH8-M0g>.

Tom Basile: Welcome back to America Right Now. It has been a week since 
Afghanistan fell to the Taliban, and still tens of thousands of Americans and 
Afghanis are still trapped in the country facing an uncertain future. To get 
his views on how we got here, and how we move forward, former Deputy Secretary 
of Defense under President George W Bush, someone who is an architect of our 
national response after 9/11, Paul Wolfowitz, he joins us on the phone. Mr. 
Secretary, good to have you with us

Andy Bichlbaum (as "Paul Wolfowitz"): Great to have you. Thank you.

TB: So we are nearing the 20th anniversary of 9/11. You were there at the 
beginning. Successive administrations have openly questioned our engagement in 
Afghanistan and even dismissed it, but maintaining the status quo was an 
important operational objective that we were achieving. Did you believe that 
the the mission in some form should have continued?

AB: Oh absolutely, Tom, that goes without saying. You know there's been a lot 
of talk about how President Biden ended this war in Afghanistan, and on what we 
have to do now. But there's very little about the fact that Biden did end this 
war. And of course we do have to rescue our allies — I wrote recently about 
this in the Washington Post [sic]. And every single Afghan who needs to get out 
of there should be able to do so.  But Tom, what the piece in the Wall Street 
Journal is truly about is that a sitting president, right, in the office of 
president, unnecessarily ended a war for no reason at all. Because let's be 
honest, Tom — there just aren't a lot of things that ordinary Americans can be 
proud of these days. We know that other prosperous countries have it better in 
health care, infrastructure, education, elder care, food options, and income.  
And if you take away our global dominance, we're left with a whole lot of 
nothing.

Biden should have waited till he at least got something passed in terms of 
health care and education, for example, or even just transport and 
infrastructure. But with nothing to show Americans why America's great, 
dominance in a place like Afghanistan is all we've got to keep us away from 
that ledge. Now of course two trillion dollars could have been spent building 
stuff that people want, instead of going to big defense contractors and 
shareholders. But that's all milk under the table, Tom.

And the point is, ending a war with nothing at all to replace it is the 
pinnacle of irresponsibility. When you've got crumbling infrastructure, rising 
addiction and death rates, poor food options, substandard education, expensive 
health care and so on — Americans just can't be proud of that. But they can be 
proud of a war, even if it's unwinnable, even if it lasts 20 years, even if 
it's been a failure from day one, in my administration. That's what we've lost 
and that is truly tragic, Tom.

TB: Mr. Secretary, you want to talk about that op-ed that you wrote in the Wall 
Street Journal last week offering the administration five steps that they 
should take to protect our citizens and Afghans? It was it was a very adult 
thing to do. You said, let's talk about all the stuff that happened before 
later, let's talk about what the operational needs are now. That and those 
folks need to get out of the country.  Walk us through some of those and 
whether you believe the administration is taking those actions at this point.

AB: Well, it's really hard to tell. I'm not the administration of course, so 
all I can do is observe from a distance. I was in the administration that began 
the war, and I have to say that in retrospect it's very clear that two trillion 
dollars could have gone to a lot of things that Americans could now be proud 
of, instead of a 20-year unwinnable war and the dismal failure that we have 
seen.  There's a lot of factors in this dismal failure you know — it's not fair 
to put it all on the footstool of president Biden.  But it is a failure and 
that is the key thing here.  Americans cannot be proud of a failure, they 
cannot be proud of this war, this 20-year war. 

They could have been proud of many things that two trillion dollars would pay 
for, such as superior education, or free education, and health care, and so on 
and so forth, all the things that Americans want, including everything that's 
in this infrastructure bill and beyond. 
But it's gone to the Lockheed Martins of the world instead.

TB: Mr Secretary, I want to, I want to stick on foreign policy. You're on the 
board of No One, of an organization called No One Left Behind. So talk to us 
about that organization and what they are doing, uh, in the here and now, to 
help those who are stranded under Taliban rule.

AB: Of course. Well, we are doing everything in our logistical capacity, which 
is frankly, Tom, not that much. I mean we're talking about a large country with 
millions of people. If every single Afghan man, woman, and child who deserves 
to get out of there — which is every single Afghan man, woman, and child — 
let's be frank, every single one of them deserves to get out of there — then 
there is no way that an organization which is at the end of the day a small 
organization can possibly help with that.  The entire US military could not 
possibly help with that either.

The fact is that there are a lot of people who will remain and it's not going 
to be a pleasant situation. It could have been a better situation, certainly 
for people in Afghanistan. For Americans though, 300 million Americans, what 
this means is that there is one less thing left to be proud of, and without the 
sorts of things that we should have here at home that leaves pretty much 
nothing at all to keep us away from that cultural ledge, let's call it.

TB: Okay, now, now, um, so, so that organization is not, is not assisting, 
you're saying that their, what, their efforts is not, they're, they're not 
actually helping?

AB: Well, we're certainly assisting. That organization is doing absolutely the 
best it can. But that's kind of nothing compared to a 20-year war that cost two 
trillion dollars that could have been spent on things that Americans would 
need.  We have rising death rates from addiction, rising addiction rates, less 
and less access to education, lower incomes, etc. And none of that is what that 
two trillion dollars went to over 20 years, so from day one it was a little bit 
of a….

TB: Well, I mean, and just, just to be fair, I mean, we've spent trillions of 
dollars on loads of of public assistance and welfare programming and other 
things over the course of the 20 years here domestically. Um. I, but i want 
again, i want to, I want to stick with the foreign policy, and, and this and 
the war on terrorism and, and you and i stood together after the bombing of the 
Al Rashid hotel in Baghdad as the casualties were being brought out there. You 
have comforted the families of the fallen, you have stood behind that podium at 
the Pentagon that we all watched earlier, you've seen firsthand.  Many 
Americans feel that the war on terrorism, Islamic terrorism is real. Now the 
Obama administration tried to scrub the global war on terrorism from our 
lexicon and foreign policy.  And I want to play for you a clip from President 
Biden's interview the other day — just take a listen to this.

INTERVIEWER: "Are you committed to making sure that the troops stay until every 
american who wants to be out is out?"

Biden: "Yes" 

INTERVIEWER: "How about our Afghan allies, does the commitment hold for them as 
well?"

Biden: "The commitment holds to get everyone out, that in fact we can get out 
and everyone should come out, and that's the objective. That's what we're doing 
now, that's the path we're on, and i think we'll get some…." [fades]

TB: Uh, that was the wrong clip. But what i really wanted to play for you, Mr. 
Secretary, was that the president seems to continue to talk about Afghanistan 
within sort of the context just about Al-Qaeda. Um, why don't people in 
Washington understand that, that our, our dealings with, and our national 
security concerns with respect to terror groups, uh, and those of our allies, 
uh, is not just about Al Qaeda or Bin Laden, it's broader than that?

AB: Well, look, Tom, there have been a lot of mistakes here. There have been a 
lot of mistakes from day one. Talking about the Taliban as being the same as Al 
Qaeda or what have you — I haven't heard that clip but I'll take your word for 
it — is a mistake. And pulling out of Afghanistan without anything to show for 
it, without anything to show here or there, is a mistake. But there have been 
mistakes made from the get-go, from the administration that i was a part of, 
enormous mistakes. The last administration also, when President Trump met with 
the Taliban and conceded an enormous amount of things to them in advance — that 
was a mistake. 

There have been certainly Obama, President Obama's, uh, you know, whitewashing 
or whatever you want to call it, of the record — was a mistake.

Um, the whole, I would say the whole 20-year war has been one colossal mistake 
that was fairly easy to predict.

TB: But what do we do now, Mr Secretary, and especially since you were you were 
there at the beginning, you were one of the architects of of the global war on 
terrorism which I was a part of, and I was a part of, and I also believe you 
know did actually, uh, did actually achieve certain things, and we can always 
weigh the cost benefit analysis but, uh, but where do we go from here given 
the, the reality of today?

AB: Yes, no, point taken, Tom. The question is where now, and after a 20-year 
error and two trillion dollars going to defense contractors and so on, I think 
one thing we can do from here, besides evacuate everybody that's possible to 
evacuate, is learn from our errors. 
And in the future when we have two trillion dollars lying around we give it to 
causes and rebuilding here at home that is deserving, that will create the kind 
of conditions that Americans can be proud of well into the future. This has 
happened before in America, it can happen again.
We don't need to repeat mistakes.

Afghanistan itself was of course from the beginning a repeated mistake, you 
know — there was the British foray, the Russian foray, and then our foray.  We 
had had other forays that had ended up terribly tragic, I don't even need to 
remind you what those are.

TB: Yeah.

AB: I think what we can do today is simply learn from our mistakes and the next 
time we have two trillion dollars lying around we do something useful with it 
instead. 

TB: Yeah, and again I am, Mr. Secretary, i'm not entirely sure how spending 
trillions on, on, on, on roads, which may be necessary here from a domestic 
policy standpoint, actually, uh, improves or, or protects this country from a 
national security standpoint. Uh, but we do appreciate you spending some time 
with us and, and appreciate your service to the country, former Deputy 
Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz. Thank you so much for your time sir.

AB: Thank you so much, Tom. 

TB: Still to come, we are tracking Hurricane Henri as he is making his way up 
the Northeast. That story is next.




#  distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission
#  <nettime>  is a moderated mailing list for net criticism,
#  collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets
#  more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l
#  archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: [email protected]
#  @nettime_bot tweets mail w/ sender unless #ANON is in Subject:

Reply via email to