Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos <[email protected]> writes: > I would like less of the internals of gcm exposed to the user rather > than more. As a user of nettle I wouldn't even want to know that there > is a hash subkey on gcm.
In any case we should probably have a gcm_aes interface (and whatever other variants are relevant) that is easier to use than the lowest level gcm interface. Regards, /Niels -- Niels Möller. PGP-encrypted email is preferred. Keyid C0B98E26. Internet email is subject to wholesale government surveillance. _______________________________________________ nettle-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lysator.liu.se/mailman/listinfo/nettle-bugs
