On 03/18/2011 01:55 AM, Niels Möller wrote:
> Daniel Kahn Gillmor <[email protected]> writes:
>
>> Niels, this is clearly a derivative work of Nettle. I'm happy to put
>> whatever free license you think is appropriate on it. Is GPL-2+ OK?
>
> If by "GPL-2+" you mean GPL version 2 or (user's option) any later version,
> that's fine with me.
yes, this is what i mean.
> As you know, changing the Nettle license to (some version of) the LPGL
> is planned. When that happens, it would make some sense for the perl
> bindings to follow, even if sticking to the GPL is still a perfectly
> acceptable option.
Sure, I'd be happy to follow the licensing changes.
--dkg
_______________________________________________
nettle-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.lysator.liu.se/mailman/listinfo/nettle-bugs
