On 03/23/2011 06:25 AM, Niels Möller wrote: > Daniel Kahn Gillmor <[email protected]> writes: > >> Any further comments? > > The following (in nettle.texinfo) looks a bit strange. > >> +@deftypevrx {Constant Struct * Constant} {struct nettle_hash *} >> nettle_hashes[] > >> +@deftypevrx {Constant Struct * const} {struct nettle_cipher *} >> nettle_ciphers[] > > I'm no texinfo guru, but I think the first {...} is supposed to be just a > category > (Function, Macro, Variable, etc), and the second {...} the type. I thik > > @deftypevrx {Constant Struct} {struct nettle_hash **} nettle_hashes > > would be more correct (unless we want a new categories "Algorithm List" > which I think is a bit overkill), but I haven't yet checked the > generated output.
Ah, ok. I'm no texinfo guru either -- i just put in what made the pdf
output look reasonable. Your changes make at least as much sense to me
as what i put in there.
Thanks for fixing it,
--dkg
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ nettle-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lysator.liu.se/mailman/listinfo/nettle-bugs
