Simon Josefsson <[email protected]> writes:

> fre 2012-11-30 klockan 12:38 +0100 skrev Niels Möller:

>> I think I'd still like to do the header split, sha.h -> sha1.h and
>> sha2.h, for better consistency within Nettle, but that's less intrusive,
>> and backwards compatibility is trivial, with a sha.h including both.
>
> Yes, doing that split makes sense to me.  SHA256 etc doesn't have much
> in common with SHA1, so they belong in separate header files.

I did that split the other day.

And while updating hash documentation, I also reorganized that section
of the manual a bit.

Regards,
/Niels

-- 
Niels Möller. PGP-encrypted email is preferred. Keyid C0B98E26.
Internet email is subject to wholesale government surveillance.
_______________________________________________
nettle-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.lysator.liu.se/mailman/listinfo/nettle-bugs

Reply via email to