On 01/03/2013 06:09 PM, Niels Möller wrote: > What's missing, more precisely? E.g., salsa20_crypt is both in the > salsa20.h header file and in the Salsa20 section in the manual.
It may be better to refer to it as salsa20/20. Then it would be clear which variant it is. > >> From the code and the previous discussion in the ML I >> see that the 20 rounds variant is there. > Right, other variants where postponed for lack of clear use cases. As far as I know Salsa20 isn't standardized in a protocol. However if that occurs it may be that the 20/12 variant is selected because of estream. > What name should it use, salsa20_12_crypt? I imagine there are some > testvectors somewhere on the ecrypt site? No idea. regards, Nikos _______________________________________________ nettle-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lysator.liu.se/mailman/listinfo/nettle-bugs
