On 02/17/2013 09:47 AM, Niels Möller wrote: > Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos <[email protected]> writes: > >> That's pretty good table. It would be nice to have a comparison of >> modinv with mpz_invert as a baseline (you also don't need to use a >> timing resistant modinv during verification). > > That would make sense. On the mpn level, the corresponding GMP function > is mpn_gcdext. > >> How hard could it be to add the wmNAF multiplication from ecc_mulmod.c >> in gnutls to this list for comparison? > Do you have some example code to use this gnutls function? Then I'm > afraid it might also be a bit tricky to get linking right if we want to > have it all in the same benchmark executable.
This is not exported from gnutls (we only export the high level API). I meant copying it from there with the functions it depends on (they aren't be many) and adding it to the test you have. regards, Nikos _______________________________________________ nettle-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lysator.liu.se/mailman/listinfo/nettle-bugs
