On 04/11/2013 09:38 PM, Niels Möller wrote: >> Here's a tentative Nettle interface for umac. Comments appreciated. > Implemented now.
Nice. > I also added some benchmark code, but I'm not sure if it measures short > (< 16 Mbyte) or larger messages, since the benchmarking function keeps > calling the update function with a stop condition based on elapsed time. > It's clearly a bit faster than the other hash functions, even with > 128-bit output. It is a bit unfair to compare umac with plain hashes. In the last patch there was an addition to the benchmarks to have HMAC performance as well. regards, Nikos _______________________________________________ nettle-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lysator.liu.se/mailman/listinfo/nettle-bugs
