Martin Storsjö <[email protected]> writes: > I wouldn't suggest moving away from the unified syntax - being able to > build for both thumb and arm from the same source is useful.
Ok, if that is useful, I guess we should move in the opposite direction and use it for *all* arm assembly files. But I'm worrying that the same old assemblers which barf on orr r4,r8,lsl#8 may also barf on the itee instruction which is required for conditional execution in unified syntax. Except possibly conditional branches, I don't remember. Could of course use some configure/m4 magic to get around that, if we think it's worth the effort. Regards, /Niels -- Niels Möller. PGP-encrypted email is preferred. Keyid C0B98E26. Internet email is subject to wholesale government surveillance. _______________________________________________ nettle-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lysator.liu.se/mailman/listinfo/nettle-bugs
