-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Aloha!
Sorry for being less than involved in the discussions. I agree with Simon on the naming scheme. MVH JoachiMS Niels Möller wrote: > Simon Josefsson <[email protected]> writes: > >> I don't like it -- as far as I recall, DJB calls the ciphers >> Salsa20 and ChaCha respectively. When round-specific counts are >> introduced, the naming is Salsa20/R and ChaChaR respectively. > > That's my understanding too. > >> I don't think it is good to move away from the "upstream" naming >> scheme for a cipher, even if the naming scheme isn't consistent >> between ciphers. > > I think I agree. > >> Alternatively, 'salsa20_128_set_key'. I think I prefer one of >> these variants the most. > > I think it will be > > void salsa20_128_set_key(struct salsa20_ctx *ctx, const uint8_t > *key); void salsa20_256_set_key(struct salsa20_ctx *ctx, const > uint8_t *key); > > void salsa20_set_key(struct salsa20_ctx *ctx, size_t length, const > uint8_t *key); > > then. > > Regards, /Niels > > - -- Med vänlig hälsning, Yours Joachim Strömbergson - Alltid i harmonisk svängning. ======================================================================== Joachim Strömbergson Secworks AB [email protected] ======================================================================== -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.22 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAlLddTEACgkQZoPr8HT30QHuJQCgjardhNxnNu1nwyE1+jznpHhZ NuoAoPHtxrVEmv/9V8z61ALr1pLOgHsS =U9w5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ nettle-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lysator.liu.se/mailman/listinfo/nettle-bugs
