-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Aloha!

Niels Möller wrote:
> Plain memcmp should be optimized for speed, I guess.

Maybe. I wouldn't be surprised if the OpenBSD folks would think it would
be an acceptable performance cost to make it more side channel silent.
Or at least provide a silent version om memcmp.

I'm actually gonna check - their fork of OpenSSL should probably be
using something like that.

Nikos - What do you do in GnuTLS?

- -- 
Med vänlig hälsning, Yours

Joachim Strömbergson - Alltid i harmonisk svängning.
========================================================================
 Joachim Strömbergson          Secworks AB          [email protected]
========================================================================
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.22 (Darwin)
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
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=eZer
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
nettle-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.lysator.liu.se/mailman/listinfo/nettle-bugs

Reply via email to