Hello, I was checking what is required for the chacha-poly1305 implementation to be kept up to date with the current draft [0], on Last-Call. My understanding is that the current implementation: 1. Is missing support for 96-bit nonce Chacha (could be solved by adding a chacha_set_nonce96 function) 2. Misses the optimization which you proposed to CFRG (and was incorporated).
It seems however, that if nettle is changed for the latter (i.e., to pad AAD), then using chacha_poly1305_update() becomes tricky. It could only be called once. Would in that case make sense to rename it to chacha_poly1305_set_aad() rather than update? regards, Nikos [0]. https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-irtf-cfrg-chacha20-poly1305-02 _______________________________________________ nettle-bugs mailing list nettle-bugs@lists.lysator.liu.se http://lists.lysator.liu.se/mailman/listinfo/nettle-bugs
