Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos <[email protected]> writes: > To revive this discussion, it seems that there is a proposal to add OCB in > TLS. > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-zauner-tls-aes-ocb-00
I guess we need to get into release mode soon (I'll send another message to try to sort out loose ends), but it might be possible to to ocb. I've had a quick look at RFC7253. According to wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OCB_mode), that is "OCB2", is that the relevant version? Has the ietf discussion clarified the patent issues? I'm going to mail fsf lawyers about the patent license (http://web.cs.ucdavis.edu/~rogaway/ocb/license1.pdf), I suspect they're not compatible with the LGPL. Regards, /Niels -- Niels Möller. PGP-encrypted email is preferred. Keyid C0B98E26. Internet email is subject to wholesale government surveillance. _______________________________________________ nettle-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lysator.liu.se/mailman/listinfo/nettle-bugs
