On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 3:16 PM, Niels Möller <[email protected]> wrote:
> Aaron Boxer <[email protected]> writes: > > > For KM_prng.cpp , are you suggesting that I use 128 bit AES instead of > 256 > > bit ? > > I think the original code used 256 bit. > > I might have misread the code. If the original code used 256-bit aes, > always, you should use nettle's aes256_ctx when porting it over. > Niels, you were right, the code does use 128 bit encryption. Thanks so much, Aaron _______________________________________________ nettle-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lysator.liu.se/mailman/listinfo/nettle-bugs
