On Sat, 2017-05-20 at 22:09 +0200, Niels Möller wrote: > > include $(srcdir)/.test-rules.make > > [3. text/x-patch; 0002-Added-the-TLS-1.0-PRF-and-test- > vectors.patch]... > > [4. text/x-patch; 0003-Added-the-TLS-1.2-PRF-and-test- > vectors.patch]... > > Can we postpone tls-1.0 and tls-1.2 for now, and try to get the more > generally useful hkdf in?
Do you mean for the 3.3 release of nettle? Do you have any concerns with including the TLS PRF? The reason I pushed that along with HKDF is that I see nettle best suited for the low level primitives because of its interface and because it allows for easy unit testing. I can keep these in gnutls, though it would simplify things for gnutls if nettle could have the TLS primitives. regards, Nikos _______________________________________________ nettle-bugs mailing list nettle-bugs@lists.lysator.liu.se http://lists.lysator.liu.se/mailman/listinfo/nettle-bugs
