I know of one or two applications that moved to nettle once the des functionality was removed from libcrypt. Not sure if that's a good reason to keep it, they are deprecated, but removing it may make it slower to move to that version.
On May 11, 2019 7:40:34 PM UTC, [email protected] wrote: >Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <[email protected]> writes: > >> Is there anything that we can do to help with 3.5? > >I've just updated the NEWS file, please review. Since it's an ABI >break, >maybe a few more things could be deleted. > >* Can we delete _rsa_blind/_rsa_unblind (currently demoted from rsa.h >to > rsa-internal.h, and with internal symbol names). > >* dsa-compat.h (compatibility with Nettle older than 3.0)? > >* des-compat.h (compatibility with old libdes/openssl)? Also mentioned > as a candidate for deletion when Nettle-3.0 was released. > >> I'm still playing around HMAC/digest refactoring, but I'm not happy >with the >> way code looks in my tree. > >I've committed changes to move buffers last in the hash context >structs. >That should make it a bit easier, but probably still not so pretty. > >Regards, >/Niels > >-- >Niels Möller. PGP-encrypted email is preferred. Keyid 368C6677. >Internet email is subject to wholesale government surveillance. >_______________________________________________ >nettle-bugs mailing list >[email protected] >http://lists.lysator.liu.se/mailman/listinfo/nettle-bugs -- Sent from my mobile. Please excuse my brevity. _______________________________________________ nettle-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lysator.liu.se/mailman/listinfo/nettle-bugs
