Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbarysh...@gmail.com> writes:
> +union nettle_block8
> +{
> + uint8_t b[8];
> + unsigned long w[8 / sizeof(unsigned long)];
> + uint64_t u64;
> +};
The "unsigned long w" seems unneeded (in nettle_block16, it could
also be retired; it's from a time when Nettle didn't use uint64_t).
Maybe one could do without this union and simply use uint64_t, but then
one would need some casts to (uint8_t *). So a union may be clearer.
Regards,
/Niels
--
Niels Möller. PGP-encrypted email is preferred. Keyid 368C6677.
Internet email is subject to wholesale government surveillance.
_______________________________________________
nettle-bugs mailing list
nettle-bugs@lists.lysator.liu.se
http://lists.lysator.liu.se/mailman/listinfo/nettle-bugs
