Hello Niels, On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 12:25:05PM +0100, Niels Möller wrote:
> > Let me know if there are any outstanding issues regarding armeb and I'll > > look into them. > To keep it in working shape, it would help a lot with additional tests > in .gitlab-ci. I'm not really familiar with the cross setup used for > arm, mips, and aarch64, Nikos helped with all that. But maybe armeb can > be added in the same way? That's exactly the rabbithole I went down and got lost in the last time: armeb is so niche that I'm not aware of any ready-to-install mainstream distribution for it. I am running Gentoo but that's not easy to maintain in a CI setting. I got a Debian-based qemu-user-binfmt_misc-based image working but that was very brittle as well because in the end it also needed to bootstrap the necessary components from source. So as it stands I cannot offer any improved CI for armeb that's maintainable with reasonable effort. On the other hand: The armeb asm changes (for the most part) are so symmetric that any breakage would likely affect both armeb and armel. -- Michael _______________________________________________ nettle-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lysator.liu.se/mailman/listinfo/nettle-bugs
