Hello,

вс, 5 апр. 2020 г. в 23:27, Niels Möller <[email protected]>:
> Dmitry Baryshkov <[email protected]> writes:
>
> > GnuTLS project would like to ask you to bump libhogweed soname as a
> > way to enforce recompilation because of the ecc-internal.h usage.
>
> I guess that makes sense. It will inconvenience all other packages which
> don't access internals and which could benefit from ABI compatibility
> and unchanged soname, though.

Thank you.

> That said, I would wish a default gnutls build did *not* use internal
> functions, and had a configure option to enable use of internals, for
> users and packagers who understand the consequences. That would be
> analogous to the --enable-gmp-internals configure argument for MPFR.

Heh. We all would wish for a better world. I'd wish for feedback on
the patches. VKO has been sent on February, 15th. Two merge requests
on git.lysator.liu.se also do not any feedback except FUD.

> > Other than that it would be nice to get GOST VKO key derivation
> > algorithm to supplement GOST digital signatures algorithm.
>
> I don't want to delay the release for that. Ok?

That's fine.

--
With best wishes
Dmitry
_______________________________________________
nettle-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.lysator.liu.se/mailman/listinfo/nettle-bugs

Reply via email to