I posted a performance test here https://lists.lysator.liu.se/pipermail/nettle-bugs/2020/009169.html Personally, I prefer keeping the altivec version in nettle library since it's faster than C implementation but I'm not sure whether the performance margin fits with the library's convention of optimizing such functions.
On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 8:40 AM Amos Jeffries <[email protected]> wrote: > On 28/09/20 8:25 am, Maamoun TK wrote: > > gcm_fill() got C optimization which performs close to the one I > > What do you mean by "close"? > faster or slower? > and it that difference consistent? > > If the other implementation is slower (even by a few nanosec) it can be > useful keeping this fast code around for builds where high-performance > is critical. > > > AYJ > _______________________________________________ > nettle-bugs mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.lysator.liu.se/mailman/listinfo/nettle-bugs > _______________________________________________ nettle-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lysator.liu.se/mailman/listinfo/nettle-bugs
