Niels Möller <[email protected]> writes: > Daiki Ueno <[email protected]> writes: > >> Sorry for the confusion and thank you for the explanation; now I get it. >> I pushed a change along the of option (2). Could you take a look again? > > Thanks, looks good! Two nits, and let me know at which point you'd like > to get it merged, and do further improvements as followup MRs.
Thank you; I have addressed those issues. As for the merging, I think it is ready now. I have also created a draft MR in GnuTLS to use the algorithm in PKCS#8, etc., so we can test the implementation in a broader context: https://gitlab.com/gnutls/gnutls/-/merge_requests/1805 > Since the oaep.h header now only declares internal functions, it > shouldn't be installed (moved from HEADERS to DISTFILES in Makefile.in). > > And it would be nice if the manual could give some more detail about the > label: As I understnd it, the label is optional, so it's fine to pass 0, > NULL if not needed. And if used, the same label must be used for both > encrypt and decrypt. Regards, -- Daiki Ueno _______________________________________________ nettle-bugs mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
