On 7/15/24 2:08 PM, Bill Roberts wrote:
On 7/15/24 12:05 PM, Niels Möller wrote:
Bill Roberts <[email protected]> writes:
Besides just ensuring the gnu notes displays the right bits, how was
this test this?
For testing, maybe one could do something similar to
https://git.lysator.liu.se/nettle/nettle/-/blob/master/testsuite/x86-ibt-test.c?ref_type=head
I've been doing a bunch of these, and my testing has been just running
the existing test suite, built with BTI support
on a BTI enabled system. I did look more closely at the labels and all
the branches are direct so they don't need bti
landing pads. I can test your patch and report back, so really outside
of testing I think my only suggestion is to
swap the bti c with the hint instruction. Apologies for the disclaimer
previously, I forgot our server appends that.
Your patch failed to apply:
git am 0001-build-Support-PACBTI-in-AArch64-assembly.patch
Applying: build: Support PACBTI in AArch64 assembly
error: patch failed: configure.ac:1041
error: configure.ac: patch does not apply
Patch failed at 0001 build: Support PACBTI in AArch64 assembly
on HEAD:
---
git log -1 --format=email
From 775d6adb77a885616ef3a9fcbc4c087cad129f3d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Niels=20M=C3=B6ller?= <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2023 07:53:18 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Add link to puthon bindings.
---
My tree is clean.
Do you have this on a remote I can pull from?
Regards,
/Niels
_______________________________________________
nettle-bugs mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
_______________________________________________
nettle-bugs mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
