We have people of Google in the Netty Team so there should be no need to worry.
> On 27 Jun 2016, at 05:12, [email protected] wrote: > > Reading on the BoringSSL website, it says "We don't recommend that third > parties depend upon it. Doing so is likely to be frustrating because there > are no guarantees of API or ABI stability". > > Regarding the netty-tcnative maven artifact with BoringSSL statically linked, > is using it recommended in production? I'd just be worried that a situation > might come up that an urgent security patch to BoringSSL was made, but that > there might be a large delay in implementing support for it in netty-tcnative > because there were a lot of breaking changes made to BoringSSL... or is this > not really a concern? > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Netty discussions" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/netty/f6a5d8ad-7288-44b3-9971-b178a9eafe62%40googlegroups.com > > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/netty/f6a5d8ad-7288-44b3-9971-b178a9eafe62%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout > <https://groups.google.com/d/optout>. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Netty discussions" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/netty/A8236CF2-386E-4E61-B367-FA553065C73B%40googlemail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
