On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 12:10, V. Sasi Kumar<[email protected]> wrote: > The debate on the form and structure of FOSSCOMM seems to have petered
s/debate/discussion. Btw, does'nt a formal structure follow the group's goals and objectives? - which i hope gets defined soon, just so that we transcend from YAML to an "effective sounding board for all projects that use the tax-payers money". > out. So I suggest that we have a loose network for now -- just a venue > for sharing ideas and working together on important issues. And, of > course, making representations on matters that all of us agree upon. I > think these are the vital areas where such a collaboration can be very > useful. Since all of us are, in one way or another, involved in > promoting Free Software, we, as individuals or separate organisations, > can collaborate in specific activities, if needed. When we have to > represent issues to the GoI, we will follow the method we adopted for > the Standards issue. Let us proceed like this for some time and see how > things evolve. sounds good. -- thanks || vid || http://www.svaksha.com || _______________________________________________ network mailing list [email protected] http://lists.fosscom.in/listinfo.cgi/network-fosscom.in
