in-line :- On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 09:38, Raj Mathur<[email protected]> wrote: > On Monday 07 Sep 2009, shirish wrote: >> So you want the list to have a particular way of defining rights >> which works best to your interest. > > Er, that's rather a large assumptive leap, isn't it? I'd thrown in CC- > BY-SA as a suggestion, though I fail to see how it works to my interest > in any way (apart from working for the list in general, which includes > me). Point being, there ought to be a overall licence for the list, not > individual licences per e-mail.
yes, it was an assumption. I agree that there should be a clear license for this list. >> I would be particularly >> interested to know why CC-SA and not CC-SA-A if we are talking about >> the CC licenses. > Is there such a licence, CC-SA-A? I stand corrected, it is CC-SA has attribution in-built. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/ > Regards, > > -- Raj > -- > Raj Mathur [email protected] http://kandalaya.org/ > GPG: 78D4 FC67 367F 40E2 0DD5 0FEF C968 D0EF CC68 D17F > PsyTrance & Chill: http://schizoid.in/ || It is the mind that moves -- Regards, Shirish Agarwal My quotes in this email licensed under CC 3.0 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ http://flossexperiences.wordpress.com 065C 6D79 A68C E7EA 52B3 8D70 950D 53FB 729A 8B17 _______________________________________________ network mailing list [email protected] http://lists.fosscom.in/listinfo.cgi/network-fosscom.in
