On Thursday 20 May 2010, Pranesh Prakash wrote: > On Wednesday 19 May 2010 11:42 PM, Nagarjuna G wrote: > > The issue that remains is: as per the definition of open standards > > adopted by the FOSS community, FRAND or RAND should not exist. > > Currently if this policy is adopted, FRAND and RAND condition may > > now become part of open standards definition within Indian legal > > regime. This is a dilution. > > The relevant part of the clause is clearly an exception: "If such > Standards are not found feasible then in the wider public interest". > It goes on to state that FRAND and RAND "with no payment" could be > considered. > > Apart from semantics, F/RAND + no payments (with the standard > disclaimers of being irrevocable, etc.) = Royalty-Free. > > Sure, exceptions (which the policy, from the perspective of > governance, must have) can be widely construed. That does not in > and of itself damage the policy, so long as the exceptions don't > invite such constructions. I don't believe these do. And, the > policy being on the rulebooks is only a reason for us to be ever > more vigilant in ensuring that the exceptions are few and that the > spirit of the policy (which is very crisply laid out in the Preamble > and clause 1) is followed.
Agreed. Insofar as the issue of RAND/FRAND with no royalty is concerned, what the draft policy seems to be proposing is exactly what the community would have asked for. Proprietary standards are the only option in fields where appropriate and extensive open standards are not available. If such proprietary standards have to exist, we would want them perpetually royalty-free under RAND or FRAND terms. Apart from arm-twisting vendors into making their RF RAND/FRAND standards open, I see no way out of this dilemma and believe that GoI is proposing the right approach. Regards, -- Raj -- Raj Mathur [email protected] http://kandalaya.org/ GPG: 78D4 FC67 367F 40E2 0DD5 0FEF C968 D0EF CC68 D17F PsyTrance & Chill: http://schizoid.in/ || It is the mind that moves _______________________________________________ network mailing list [email protected] http://lists.fosscom.in/listinfo.cgi/network-fosscom.in
