On Tuesday 07 Sep 2010, Mohit Singh wrote: > kindly consider this as full post - > > The following is at - > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shared_source#Microsoft_Public_License_. > 28Ms-PL.29 > > is all this acceptable to FOSSCOM?
Er, do you mean whether FOSSCOM accepts it as a free software/open source licence, or whether FOSSCOM recommends software be licensed under this licence? In either case, to the best of my knowledge, FOSSCOM doesn't have the authority to do anything with its opinion. Also in either case, if FSF and OSI have both accepted the MS-PL as a FOSS licence, what difference does FOSSCOM's opinion make? And why worry about yet another GPL-incompatible licence? Regards, -- Raj -- Raj Mathur [email protected] http://kandalaya.org/ GPG: 78D4 FC67 367F 40E2 0DD5 0FEF C968 D0EF CC68 D17F PsyTrance & Chill: http://schizoid.in/ || It is the mind that moves _______________________________________________ network mailing list [email protected] http://lists.fosscom.in/listinfo.cgi/network-fosscom.in
