Dear Guru & parmeender,

It seems you couldnt able to spend time for  answering mail of RMS
pointing the lack of conceptual clarity for your new term in Mail
http://lists.fosscom.in/pipermail/network-fosscom.in/2010-September/002915.html

I am trying to address the Another pillar of your Public software
formulation- The public good space . I feel  It also shares the issues
of conceptual confusion

What is a Public good & what makes a public good is an important
question. Then only we can reach at What makes software for Public
good

A public good is non rivalrous and non excludable in the sense of a
street light. if i get light from it, it does not exclude you from
enjoying it or reduces the light you get that is a public good
it is with respect to 'specific goods (commodities)' .  not commodity
in that mares sense. Software for the public good need not be a
"public good" because it can be excludable and rivalrous

A mango is excludable and rivalous, if i eat it you will not get it.
but that does not mean that we cannot  have two different mangoes.  we
can certainly have two mangoes or any number of mangoes as the number
of people. government giving noon meal to kids is not "public good"

It is free software but it need not, public software included', be non
excludable or non rivalrous. But software with 4 freedoms is always a
public good . it is free. it is non excludable and non rivalrous. you
using the software will not affect my usage or restrict my usage . But
Public software efinition you push make it both excludable and
rivalrous
So public software can be exactly that -NOT a public good

In short Public software is NOT a public good,

And the notion of public good you are pushing does not include the
commons . Remember Software for commons will be always Free Software

I suggest ITfc to withdraw from popularising this unwanted term . and
join with FOSSCOMM in spreading the Proper Term with clarity

Anivar

-- 
"[It is not] possible to distinguish between 'numerical' and
'nonnumerical' algorithms, as if numbers were somehow different from
other kinds of precise information." - Donald Knuth
_______________________________________________
network mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.fosscom.in/listinfo.cgi/network-fosscom.in

Reply via email to