On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 12:58 PM, Narendra Sisodiya <[email protected]> wrote:
> > The only point i want to make that CC is good if you want to share but not > icremental remix. more of the e-learning (and not ART work) are increamental > work. > For example, What is the license of email of this mailing list ? and lets > suppose everyone is allow to license their email under some creative commons > lincese. > if we start disucussing then we will end up nowhere or may be with 20 > meeting and 200 page of legal document which tells about legalness of > sharing. > I started with CC-NC because I want to include some Cc-NC content in Linux > distro otherwise I have to create them. How can it not be used for incremental updates ? Just maintain the list of all authors, like you maintain a list of all code commiters for a software project. Some free software projects add a list of authors file, with every download but some do not but changelog reflects all commiters. Same can be applied with the artifact. For example in a JPEG file you can add custom exif tags to represent list of change authors. As for CC-NC, you simple do not get the license. If you want to add the work in a linux distro, which in-turn is distributed freely, it is not a violation. Also, the section 4 of CC-NC license attempts to define "commercial". As for making money by distributing DVD distribution problem, you can write to the copyright holder request permission and clearly state that user might have to pay shipping+ handling charges for DVD but you do not plan to sell the distro itself. I have used non-CC licensed works in non-profit ventures couple of times using this approach. So, I do not understand why an artist would refuse you the waiver for CC-NC licensed work. regards Vivek -- The hidden harmony is better than the obvious!! _______________________________________________ network mailing list [email protected] http://lists.fosscom.in/listinfo.cgi/network-fosscom.in
