hi i cannot agree to certain sections and strongly differ as well , example::
"This structure makes networks enormously resilient and adaptable in low-risk situations. Wikipedia is a perfect example. It doesn’t have an editor, sitting in New York, who directs and corrects each entry. The effort of putting together each entry is self-organized. If every entry in Wikipedia were to be erased tomorrow, the content would swiftly be restored, because that’s what happens when a network of thousands spontaneously devote their time to a task.There are many things, though, that networks don’t do well. Car companies sensibly use a network to organize their hundreds of suppliers, but not to design their cars. No one believes that the articulation of a coherent design philosophy is best handled by a sprawling, leaderless organizational system. Because networks don’t have a centralized leadership structure and clear lines of authority, they have real difficulty reaching consensus and setting goals cheers -s --- On Wed, 13/10/10, Senthil S <[email protected]> wrote: From: Senthil S <[email protected]> Subject: [ot]Why the revolution will not be tweeted To: "Indian FOSS Community Network list" <[email protected]> Date: Wednesday, 13 October, 2010, 5:19 PM hi I am marking this article OT. I have given the reasoning of why I feel there is an element somebody might care to discuss in fosscomm list below though its OT here is the article: http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2010/10/04/101004fa_fact_gladwell "If Martin Luther King, Jr., had tried to do a wiki-boycott in Montgomery, he would have been steamrollered by the white power structure. And of what use would a digital communication tool be in a town where ninety-eight per cent of the black community could be reached every Sunday morning at church? The things that King needed in Birmingham—discipline and strategy—were things that online social media cannot provide. " thanks -s why i made this post : ------------------------------- 1) Activism : want to make some social change - eg : freedom struggle - activists : hardcore activists - like Gandhi . 2) free software activism : activism specific to free software domain, eg : work against software patents, eg : activists : refer hall of fame in foscomm 3) internet activism : using mailing lists , twitter, facebook, for activism for social change 4) "cloud" - the role of cloud and freedom , privacy, security has also been recently debated by the free software community [ though security, privacy are not here http://fosscomm.in/Principles now and may be added in the future ] 5) free software activists use lists and the net for their campaigns - however the article discusses where the internet helps and where it doesnt - and how - working and discussing one to one is very important to create more activists - whatever the politics is :whether its free software or civil rights or the rights of tribal people 6) or maybe i am wrong in calling "free software" activism - politics and thats a separate debate for another list
_______________________________________________ network mailing list [email protected] http://lists.fosscom.in/listinfo.cgi/network-fosscom.in
