On Wednesday 13 April 2011 02:25:16 Narendra Sisodiya wrote:

> *HERE ARE MY COMMENTS - I AM UNABLE TO READ FULL 30 PAGE DOCUMENT
> BUT HERE ARE THE MAIN COMMENTS*
>
>
>  Section 4.2 – Stage 1 Basic – Page 6 says
>
>
>  “*Connecting to the internet, using e-mail and web surfing, using
> search engines, keeping the*
>
> *computer updated and virus free, operating and managing content
> from external devices*
>
> *(sound recorders, digital cameras, scanners etc.); connect,
> disconnect, operate and*
>
> *troubleshoot digital devices;*”
>
>  The Term *Virus Free* is do not fit well, because for getting
> virus one has to Install Windows Operating System. Problem of Virus
> is almost zero in Linux based Operating System. BOSS is a Linux
> based Operating System developed by CDAC. SchoolOS is supported by
> NCERT.
>
>
>
>  *PURCHASE OF SOFTWARE *
>
>  ICT Policy should dictate about what kind of software should be
> purchased
>
>
>  In table-furniture, the reproduction cost is not zero and every
> department of government has to buy Table furniture again and
> again. Software is not physical object like Table-Furniture.
> Software can be copied again and again. Reproduction cost of a
> software is zero. Software can be shared provided we have
> Copyrighter's permission to do so.
>
>  Almost all kind of software are available in FOSS. If Government
> find that some software is not suitable or not available as FOSS
> then Govt of India can develop or purchase a software and obtains
> license to use and distribute it. 

then Govt of India must develop such software using a FOSS licence 
like the GPL3.

> This will save a huge amount of 
> money for repurchasing a piece of software again and again for same
> vendor.

This will save hughe amounts of money in unneccessarily releicensing 
the same software. Moreover this software can be shared and used by 
other states and departments.

>
>  *D Implementation Strategies*
>
>
>  * *
>
>
>  Section 4.2.1 says - *“4.2.1 A programme of ICT literacy will be
> implemented across all secondary schools in the*
>
> *States, both government and private within the XI plan period.”*
>
>
>  Every year Hardware Cost decrease and Technologies Changes are
> very rapid. So Implementation should be done in one shot. We
> suggest for partial implementation in every 5 year. ICT policy must
> dictate for a feedback mechanism for better implementation keeping
> track on rapid change of technology
>
>
>  Section 4.2.2 says - *“4.2.2 States will develop an ICT literacy
> curriculum and appropriate course materials mapped to the stages
> mentioned above for uniformity. These will be in the form of
> self-instructional materials, enabling students and teachers to
> process them on their own. The ICT literacy programme will
> endeavour to provide a broad set of generic skills and*
>
> *conceptual knowledge and not focus on mastering the use of
> specific software applications.”*
>
>
>  ICT literacy curriculum and appropriate course materials should be
> developed at central node. This is a common task which can be done
> at central place.
>
>
>  *5. ICT Infrastructure *
>
> * 5.1 Hardware Driver Specification must be available*
>
>
>
>  ICT policy should dictate to use hardware for which Driver
> Specifications is available. For example, Vendor A create a
> hardware and it give driver B to run that hardware on a particular
> Operating System platform example Windows XP. This will produce a
> kind of Vendor Lock in of a Hardware. If After some year, you want
> to install another OS then hardware may or may not work because
> Vendor A has created driver B for only particular OS. Vendor A must
> create driver for all Operating System also Vendor A must publish
> driver specifications so that anyother vendor may provide a newer
> version of driver. This is needed because Vendor A may disappear
> from market from some day we will be having his “CLOSE”
> vendor-locked hardware.
>
>
>  * Production of Hardware by Government*
>
>
>  Since India is very big, ICT implementation need to be done at
> such a large scale. Let me give example for “Computer Mouse”. For
> example, If Indian Government want to buy 100 Crore Computer mouse
> and give to every citizen of India then I think it is much better
> to produce “computer mouse” rather then by buying it from foreign
> company. This is just a small example but scenario is same.
>
>
>  * Do NOT waste Money on SMART Whieboard*
>
>
>  Now a days you can find a good number of foreign companies selling
> SMART Whiteboard. SMART Whiteboard is just a Multi-touch Projector.
> Companies are charging 1+ lakh ruppe for such device. SMART
> whiteboard is a fancy item and it do not add any value to
> classroom. Even if you want to purchase SMART Whiteboard then you
> can create SMART Whiteboard in Rupee 500 -
>
> Here is the Website - http://www.webcam-whiteboard.com/

One may note that this could be a first hands on study project for the 
school students, boosting their confidence and creativity. One may 
also note that numerous multitouch software in the FOSS domain is 
available.

>
>  “*5.1.3 Each school will be equipped with at least one computer
> laboratory with at least 10*
>
> *networked computers to begin with. Each laboratory will have a
> maximum of 20 computers,*
>
> *accommodating 40 students at a time. A student computer ratio of
> minimum 10: 1 is to be*
>
> *achieved progressively in all schools.”*
>
>
>  ICT Policy *MUST NOT *dictate the structure of Computer Lab. A
> school may decide to go with Thin Client Computing Rather then
> purchasing 200 Computers for maintaining 10 computer labs.
>
>
>
>  “*5.1.8 ICT enabled education can be significantly enhanced and
> the range of classroom*
>
> *practices expanded with the introduction of digital devices like
> still and video cameras,*
>
> *music and audio devices, digital microscopes and telescopes,
> digital probes for investigation*
>
> *of various physical parameters. These will also form a part of the
> infrastructure. States will*
>
> *make appropriate choices and promote the use of such devices in
> classrooms.”*
>
>
>  Digital Cameras Or any Other ICT device *MUST NOT* encode files
> and PATENT Encumbered format. Department of EGOV has already
> published set of OpenStandards to follow.
> http://egovstandards.gov.in/policy/policy-on-open-standards-for-e-g
>overnance/policy_doc_and_manual_used_in_printing__recd_on_Nov_12.pdf
>/view
>
>
>
>  *5.3 SOFTWARE*
>
>
>  “*5.3.1 A wide variety of software applications and tools, going
> well beyond an office suite is*
>
> *required to meet the demands of a broad based ICT literacy and ICT
> enabled teaching*
>
> *learning programme. Graphics and animation, desktop publishing,
> web designing,*
>
> *databases, and programming tools have the potential of increasing
> the range of skills and*
>
> *conceptual knowledge of the students and teachers. A judicious mix
> of software will be*
>
> *introduced in schools to keep Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) to the
> minimum.”*
>
>
>
>
>  Also Policy do not dictate about what kind of Software will be
> considered.
>
> Right now there are 2 kind of software present on this world.
>
>
>
>    1.
>
>    Proprietary Software {No Copyrights given to user, it may be a
> free of cost or highly cost software too}
>    2.
>
>    *FOSS {Free (as in freedom) and Open Source Software}* –
> {CopyRights are given to user so that he can use software for any
> purpose, learn it, modify it and share it with other users (student
> here) }
>
>
>   India is a country where the first thing you will learn is -
> “*Knowledge will increase with Sharing*”. FOSS solutions fit best
> to our education ideologies. So ICT policy must *ENFORCE* the use
> of FOSS (Free and Open Source Software).
>
>
>  *Total Cost of Ownership should be criteria for National Policy.
> Tomorrow some Vendor , Lets says Microsoft offer free of cost
> training, software, and books to India in order to give the minimum
> possible TCO, then will Indian Education System will handover
> itself to Microsoft ?*
>
>
>   Rather then looking for Total cost of ownership, select what
> should be best for our education. If something is available then
> choose it otherwise we can create our own software which will be
> best fit in our pedagogy. *If we use FOSS or create our software
> then we will get ownership of Infinite time period.*
>
>
>
>
>  * 6.1 Digital Content and Resources*
>
>
>   Best example of Digital Content Collaboration is Wikipedia. It
> maintains version history. I would like to suggest for having a
> common wiki (mediawiki software) for whole India (Bharat). All
> States will be able to collaborate. Communication for Collaboration
> can be done by MailMan Software which is basically a mailing list
> solution.
>
>  Wikibooks is a website which help in creating Open and Free book
> via online Collaboratation. Many universities are creating books on
> Wikibooks.org website. So It is highly recommand to use existing
> collaboration platform.
>
>
>   *6.2 Development of Content*
>
>
>   *HTML5 is best *suitable technology for Ebooks, Animations,
> Lessons, exercises, interactive games, models and simulations,
> videos,Presentation slides, plain text materials, graphics. HTML5
> is newer W3C web-standard which provide better web applications.
>
>  You can visit to the fist website of the world which is still
> viewable in any browser. Most of the Browser vendor are now
> creating HTML5 Support in their Browser. So If we create any
> application or any digital content in HTML5 then
>
>    -
>
>    The life of digital content become infinite. You can always view
> a web application, if it is made using W3C recommended (or draft)
> technologies. -
>
>    Web Application become platform independent
>    -
>
>    It is easy to host and share web-appications.
>
>
>  So it is highly recommended to use *HTML5 for creating Any Digital
> Resource *
>
>
>
>   W3C has SVG (since 2000 ) and CANVAS to create graphics in
> webpage. SVG is vector graphics and CANVAS is pixel graphics.
> Presentation Slides Or Audio Video Interaction can be made using
> HTML5 and Sister Technologies. SVG has full capabilities of
> animations.
>
>
>
>  “*6.2.4 Teachers and students should be encouraged to develop
> e-content collaboratively.”*
>
>
>  ICT policy should also tell for developing software by
> collaboration and prefer the software which are developed using
> collaboration. (ie FOSS)
>
>
>
>
>  * 7. Capacity Building*
>
>
>  * *Student learn very fast then teacher. Creating Training videos
> and distributing directly to student/teacher will help a lot.


-- 
Rgds
JTD
_______________________________________________
network mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.fosscom.in/listinfo.cgi/network-fosscom.in

Reply via email to